IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7126-d835727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Rural Carbon Emissions in Ecologically Fragile Energy Areas—Taking Ejin Horo Banner in Inner Mongolia as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Wang

    (School of Humanities, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723001, China
    Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, CAAS, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Dongqian Xue

    (School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Meng Wang

    (College of Chemical and Environmental Science, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723001, China)

  • Weibin Yan

    (School of Humanities, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723001, China)

Abstract

To achieve carbon neutrality in our country, studying the carbon emissions of rural residents in ecologically fragile energy areas is an important way to scientifically explore a green and low-carbon development mechanism of rural regional systems. Taking Ejin Horo Banner as an example, and based on the survey data drawn from it, this paper analyzes the characteristics and mechanism of carbon emissions in rural regional systems by using the methods of the carbon emissions factor method and multiple stepwise regression. The result showed that: (1) in the total composition of carbon emissions in Ejin Horo Banner, the sources of rural carbon emissions had remarkable characteristics. Energy consumption and livestock and poultry breeding accounted for the largest proportion, 63.89% and 22.72%, respectively. (2) In the family attributes of the rural villages in Ejin Horo Banner, the two factors that had the greatest correlation with the total carbon emissions were age and income. In energy consumption, the largest correlation coefficient with carbon emissions was 0.804 for coal, and the lowest was 0.550 for gasoline. In agricultural inputs, chemical fertilizer had the strongest correlation with carbon emissions, with a correlation coefficient of 0.734, and irrigation had the weakest, with a correlation coefficient of 0.657. In livestock production, cattle had the strongest correlation with carbon emissions, with a correlation coefficient of 0.724. In family life, the factors of daily diet consumption had a strong correlation with carbon emissions, among which the highest was the liquor consumption at 0.784, and the lowest was wastewater treatment at 0.442. (3) The multiple stepwise regression result showed that in the three production and living sectors of energy consumption, agricultural and animal husbandry investment, and household life, 21 factors had a significant predictive power on the carbon emissions in the rural regional systems of Ejin Horo Banner. Through the analysis, it was found that accelerating the popularization of green energy-saving technology, promoting the transformation of rural traditional energy utilization, improving energy efficiency, and advocating a green lifestyle are the important ways to realize rural green development in ecologically fragile energy areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Wang & Dongqian Xue & Meng Wang & Weibin Yan, 2022. "Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Rural Carbon Emissions in Ecologically Fragile Energy Areas—Taking Ejin Horo Banner in Inner Mongolia as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7126-:d:835727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7126/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7126/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina Safitri Zen & Abul Quasem Al-Amin & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Brent Doberstein, 2021. "Magnitudes of households’ carbon footprint in Iskandar Malaysia: Policy implications for sustainable development," Post-Print hal-03520198, HAL.
    2. Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Mallick, Hrushikesh & Padhan, Hemachandra, 2021. "Do educational levels influence the environmental quality? The role of renewable and non-renewable energy demand in selected BRICS countries with a new policy perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 419-432.
    3. Laurence G. Smith & Guy J. D. Kirk & Philip J. Jones & Adrian G. Williams, 2019. "The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Abraham Ayobamiji Awosusi & Seun Damola Oladipupo & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Arunkumar Jayakumar & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2021. "Dominance of Fossil Fuels in Japan’s National Energy Mix and Implications for Environmental Sustainability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    3. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Keying, 2023. "How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy? Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 671-684.
    4. Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Usman, Muhammad & Chukwuma Onwe, Joshua, 2023. "Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Ross Kingwell, 2021. "Making Agriculture Carbon Neutral Amid a Changing Climate: The Case of South-Western Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Tinta, Abdoulganiour Almame, 2023. "Energy substitution in Africa: Cross-regional differentiation effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    7. de la Cruz, Vera Ysabel V. & Tantriani, & Cheng, Weiguo & Tawaraya, Keitaro, 2023. "Yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems across climate types and sub-types: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    8. Vaziri Rad, Mohammad Amin & Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Niu, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Kai & Mahian, Omid, 2023. "Excess electricity problem in off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems: A comprehensive review from challenges to prevalent solutions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 538-560.
    9. Debuschewitz, Emil & Sanders, Jürn, 2021. "Bewertung der Umweltwirkungen des ökologischen Landbaus im Kontext der kontroversen wissenschaftlichen Diskurse," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317076, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    10. Simmons, Aaron T. & Perovic, David J. & Roth, Guy, 2022. "Making waves – Are water scarcity footprints of irrigated agricultural commodities suitable to inform consumer decisions?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    11. Kuşkaya, Sevda & Bilgili, Faik & Muğaloğlu, Erhan & Khan, Kamran & Hoque, Mohammad Enamul & Toguç, Nurhan, 2023. "The role of solar energy usage in environmental sustainability: Fresh evidence through time-frequency analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 858-871.
    12. Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur & Alam, Khosrul, 2022. "Impact of industrialization and non-renewable energy on environmental pollution in Australia: Do renewable energy and financial development play a mitigating role?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 203-213.
    13. Rashid Latief & Usman Sattar & Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Ammar Ali Gull & Yingshun Pei, 2022. "The Environmental Effects of Urbanization, Education, and Green Innovation in the Union for Mediterranean Countries: Evidence from Quantile Regression Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Xiao Xu & Teng Zhang & Ziwen Qiu & Hui Gao & Sanli Zhu, 2023. "A Method Based on NGO-HKELM for the Autonomous Diagnosis of Semiconductor Power Switch Open-Circuit Faults in Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Inverters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Tseng, Ming-Lang & Ardaniah, Viqi & Sujanto, Raditia Yudistira & Fujii, Minoru & Lim, Ming K., 2021. "Multicriteria assessment of renewable energy sources under uncertainty: Barriers to adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Shrestha, Anil & Mustafa, Andy Ali & Htike, Myo Myo & You, Vithyea & Kakinaka, Makoto, 2022. "Evolution of energy mix in emerging countries: Modern renewable energy, traditional renewable energy, and non-renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 419-432.
    17. Florian Ahrens & Johann Land & Susan Krumdieck, 2022. "Decarbonization of Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Transition Engineering Desk Study for Agriculture in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Ofori, Pamela E. & Ofori, Isaac K. & Annan, Kenneth, 2024. "The Role of Energy Equity and Income Inequality in Environmental Sustainability," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue forthcomi.
    19. Busayo Victor Osuntuyi & Hooi Hooi Lean, 2023. "Moderating Impacts of Education Levels in the Energy–Growth–Environment Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Ndlovu Wiseman & Sabine Moebs & Marizvikuru Mwale & Jethro Zuwarimwe, 2022. "The Role Of Support Organisations In Promoting Organic Farming Innovations And Sustainability," Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (MJSA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 44-50, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7126-:d:835727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.