IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6221-d819820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ELECTRE III for Strategic Environmental Assessment: A “Phantom” Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Battisti

    (Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Via della Mattonaia 8, 50121 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

The Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a systematic evaluation process of the environmental consequences of urban and territorial plans and programs which aims to guarantee a high degree of environmental protection and to contribute to integrating environmental factors during the design, adoption, and approval of plans and programs. Even if in Europe the SEA was already included in the legislation of each European Member State as of 2017, in these countries—and particularly in Italy—there is a diffuse lack of indications on procedures and/or evaluation protocols. In this article, the use of evaluation techniques in SEA is discussed. The specific objective of the research is the construction of an evaluation method to express a synthetic judgement—based on acknowledged, objective parameters—within the SEA procedure. According to the literature review, results regarding the SEA procedure, and its possible supporting methodologies, Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) appears to be the most SEA-coherent approach. Moreover, the ELECTRE method family has shown the highest suitability to perform the evaluation phase of SEA. Hence, an operational development of ELECTRE III is herein proposed and applied to a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Battisti, 2022. "ELECTRE III for Strategic Environmental Assessment: A “Phantom” Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-31, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6221-:d:819820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6221/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6221/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison Donnelly & Terry Prendergast & Marie Hanusch, 2008. "Examining Quality Of Environmental Objectives, Targets And Indicators In Environmental Reports Prepared For Strategic Environmental Assessment," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(04), pages 381-401.
    2. Bram F. Noble, 2000. "Strategic Environmental Assessment: What Is It? & What Makes It Strategic?," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(02), pages 203-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabrizio Battisti & Carlo Pisano, 2022. "Common Property in Italy. Unresolved Issues and an Appraisal Approach: Towards a Definition of Environmental-Economic Civic Value," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafik Hirji & Richard Davis, 2009. "Strategic Environmental Assessment : Improving Water Resources Governance and Decision Making," World Bank Publications - Reports 17244, The World Bank Group.
    2. K. Koppiahraj & S. Bathrinath & V. G. Venkatesh & Venkatesh Mani & Yangyan Shi, 2023. "Optimal sustainability assessment method selection: a practitioner perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 629-662, May.
    3. Walaa S. E. Ismaeel & Marwa Adel Elsayed, 2018. "The Interplay of Environmental Assessment Methods; Characterising the Institutional Background in Egypt," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Thomas B Fischer & Christopher Wood & Carys Jones, 2002. "Policy, Plan, and Programme Environmental Assessment in England, the Netherlands, and Germany: Practice and Prospects," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(2), pages 159-172, April.
    5. Morgan Vespa & A. John Sinclair & Morrissa Boerchers & Robert Gibson, 2017. "New Process, Same Doubts: Participants’ Perceptions of Strategic Environmental Assessment in Western Newfoundland," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Antonios Souloutzoglou & Anastasia Tasopoulou, 2020. "The Methods and Techniques of Strategic Environmental Assessment. Comparative Evaluation of Greek and International Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6221-:d:819820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.