IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5891-d814309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactions and Co-Governance Policies of Stakeholders in the Carbon Emission Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhao Wang

    (School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Jianmin Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

  • Zhongbing Dong

    (School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China)

Abstract

Stakeholders need to participate in the carbon abatement activities to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutralization. This paper developed a system of evaluation indices on carbon emission reduction of stakeholders to elucidate the interplaying relationships among stakeholders in carbon emission reduction by using the structural equation model. The analysis showed that (1) the five stakeholders affecting carbon-reduction intensity are ranked in the following descending order: manufacturing enterprises, government, energy supply industry, R&D organizations, and financial institutions, while (2) stakeholders positively affect manufacturing enterprises and government. Notably, manufacturing enterprises exhibit the greater positive influence on carbon-reduction intensity. Finally, (3) the study results indicated how to build the co-governance mechanism by stakeholders to reduce carbon emissions. Overall, this study provided a theoretical support for the stakeholders of carbon emission reduction to clarify their roles, cooperation, and participation in carbon emission reduction, thereby realizing their own interests, while guiding stakeholders toward the carbon emission reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhao Wang & Jianmin Wang & Zhongbing Dong, 2022. "Interactions and Co-Governance Policies of Stakeholders in the Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5891-:d:814309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianmin Wang & Victor Sifamen Sekei & Sherif Abdul Ganiyu & Jesse Jackson Makwetta, 2021. "Research on the Sustainability of the Standard Gauge Railway Construction Project in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    3. Moon, Won-Ki & Kahlor, Lee Ann & Olson, Hilary Clement, 2020. "Understanding public support for carbon capture and storage policy: The roles of social capital, stakeholder perceptions, and perceived risk/benefit of technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Meihui Jiang, 2022. "Locating the Principal Sectors for Carbon Emission Reduction on the Global Supply Chains by the Methods of Complex Network and Susceptible–Infective Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Li, Zhiguo & Wang, Jie, 2022. "Spatial spillover effect of carbon emission trading on carbon emission reduction: Empirical data from pilot regions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    6. Gu, Guangtong & Zheng, Haorong & Tong, Lingyun & Dai, Yaxian, 2022. "Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Luo & Chong Xu & Boyu Yang & Xiaoyu Chen & Yinyin Wu, 2022. "Quantitative Analysis of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policies: Perspectives of Policy Content Validity and Carbon Emissions Reduction Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Wanlin Yu & Jinlong Luo, 2022. "Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading—Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Deng, Wenyueyang & Zhang, Zenglian & Guo, Borui, 2024. "Firm-level carbon risk awareness and Green transformation: A research on the motivation and consequences from government regulation and regional development perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Zhichun Yu & Yanjiao Wan, 2023. "Can the Growth of the Digital Economy Be Beneficial for Urban Decarbonization? A Study from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Zhongmiao Sun & Qi Xu & Jinrong Liu, 2023. "Dynamic Incentive Contract of Government for Port Enterprises to Reduce Emissions in the Blockchain Era: Considering Carbon Trading Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-40, August.
    6. Bouraima, Mouhamed Bayane & Alimo, Philip Kofi & Agyeman, Stephen & Sumo, Peter Davis & Lartey-Young, George & Ehebrecht, Daniel & Qiu, Yanjun, 2023. "Africa's railway renaissance and sustainability: Current knowledge, challenges, and prospects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Che, Shuai & Wang, Jun & Chen, Honghang, 2023. "Can China's decentralized energy governance reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from new energy demonstration cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    8. Wang, Zhen & Chu, Erming & Hao, Yukai, 2024. "Towards sustainable development: How does ESG performance promotes corporate green transformation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Dejun Deng & Yi Wu & Linyi Qin, 2023. "CSR preference, market competition, and corporate financial performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1396-1409, April.
    10. Yu, Xiaolin & Wan, Kai & Du, Qunyang, 2023. "Can carbon market policies achieve a “point-to-surface” effect?—Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Hao, Xinyu & Sun, Wen & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2023. "How does a scarcer allowance remake the carbon market? An evolutionary game analysis from the perspective of stakeholders," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    12. Maretno Agus Harjoto & Sunghoon Joo & Sang Mook Lee & Hakjoon Song, 2023. "CEO Current and Prospective Wealth Option Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Behavioral Agency Model," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Yongming Zhu & Lanxiao Niu & Zheyun Zhao & Jing Li, 2022. "The Tripartite Evolution Game of Environmental Governance under the Intervention of Central Government," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Xiaodan Gao & Jinbao Li, 2024. "China’s Digital Economy: A Dual Mission of Carbon-Emission Reduction and Efficiency Enhancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Xiaogang Song & Shufan Zhai & Na Zhou, 2024. "The Carbon Emissions from Public Buildings in China: A Systematic Analysis of Evolution and Spillover Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Wu, Rongxin & Tan, Zhizhou & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    17. Xianna Su & Shujuan Ding, 2024. "Research on the Configuration Paths of Low-Carbon Transformation of Heavily Polluting Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Itotenaan Henry Ogiri, PhD & Hillary Ukachukwu Nosiri, 2022. "CSR Practice and Tax Compliance: Is there a nexus between the two?," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 440-447, September.
    19. Xin-gang, Zhao & Shuran, Hu & Hui, Wang & Haowei, Chen & Wenbin, Zhang & Wenjie, Lu, 2024. "Energy, economic, and environmental impacts of electricity market-oriented reform and the carbon emissions trading: A recursive dynamic CGE model in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    20. Sai Yuan & Xiongfeng Pan, 2023. "The spatiotemporal effects of green fiscal expenditure on low-carbon transition: empirical evidence from china’s low-carbon pilot cities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(2), pages 507-533, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5891-:d:814309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.