IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p367-d714347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do Companies Need Operational Flexibility to Reduce Waste at Source?

Author

Listed:
  • Yara Kayyali Elalem

    (College of Management of Technology (CDM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Isik Bicer

    (Schulich School of Business, York University, 111 Ian MacDonald Blvd, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada)

  • Ralf W. Seifert

    (College of Management of Technology (CDM), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
    IMD—International Institute for Management Development, Chemin de Bellerive 23, P.O. Box 915, CH-1001 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

We analyze the environmental benefits of operational flexibility that emerge in the form of less product waste during the sourcing process by reducing overproduction. We consider three different options for operational flexibility: (1) lead-time reduction, (2) quantity-flexibility contracts, and (3) multiple sourcing. We use a multiplicative demand process to model the evolutionary dynamics of demand uncertainty. We then quantify the impact of key modeling parameters for each operational-flexibility strategy on the waste ratio, which is measured as the ratio of excess inventory when a certain operational-flexibility strategy is employed to the amount when an offshore supplier is utilized without any operational flexibility. We find that the lead-time reduction strategy has the maximum capability to reduce waste in the sourcing process of buyers, followed by the quantity-flexibility and multiple-sourcing strategies, respectively. Thus, our results indicate that operational-flexibility strategies that rely on the localization of production are key to reducing waste and improving environmental sustainability at source.

Suggested Citation

  • Yara Kayyali Elalem & Isik Bicer & Ralf W. Seifert, 2021. "Why Do Companies Need Operational Flexibility to Reduce Waste at Source?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:367-:d:714347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Beril Toktay & Lawrence M. Wein & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2000. "Inventory Management of Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(11), pages 1412-1426, November.
    2. Bicer, Isik & Hagspiel, Verena, 2016. "Valuing quantity flexibility under supply chain disintermediation risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huihui Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Hui Ding & G. Keong Leong, 2017. "Optimal Remanufacturing Certification Contracts in the Electrical and Electronic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Ramani, Vinay & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2017. "A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of DellReconnect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1009-1027.
    4. Kilic, Onur A. & Tunc, Huseyin & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2018. "Heuristic policies for the stochastic economic lot sizing problem with remanufacturing under service level constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1102-1109.
    5. de Brito, Marisa P. & Dekker, Rommert, 2003. "Modelling product returns in inventory control--exploring the validity of general assumptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 225-241, January.
    6. José L. Vilar-Zanón & Eduardo Vilar & Antonio Heras, 2017. "Online product returns risk assessment and management," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 445-466, October.
    7. Roland Geyer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Atalay Atasu, 2007. "The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 88-100, January.
    8. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    9. Corbacioglu, Umut & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2007. "Setting the holding cost rates in a two-product system with remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 185-194, September.
    10. V. Daniel R. Guide , Jr. & Gilvan C. Souza & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Joseph D. Blackburn, 2006. "Time Value of Commercial Product Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1200-1214, August.
    11. Nenes, George & Panagiotidou, Sofia & Dekker, Rommert, 2010. "Inventory control policies for inspection and remanufacturing of returns: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 300-312, June.
    12. Vinayak Deshpande & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Responsible Operations and Supply Chain Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1107-1111, November.
    13. Raunaq Srivastav & Pritee Ray, 2020. "Contracts Choice in Retailer-led Supply Chain," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 19(1), pages 77-90, June.
    14. Tang, Christopher S. & Zhou, Sean, 2012. "Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 585-594.
    15. Vishal V. Agrawal & Ioannis Bellos, 2017. "The Potential of Servicizing as a Green Business Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1545-1562, May.
    16. repec:grz:wpsses:2013-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Pan, Zhendong & Tang, Jiafu & Liu, Ou, 2009. "Capacitated dynamic lot sizing problems in closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 810-821, November.
    18. Li, Jianbin & Luo, Xiaomeng & Wang, Qifei & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Supply chain coordination through capacity reservation contract and quantity flexibility contract," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Mahadevan, B. & Pyke, David F. & Fleischmann, Moritz, 2003. "Periodic review, push inventory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 536-551, December.
    20. Kim, Taebok & Glock, Christoph H. & Kwon, Yongjang, 2014. "A closed-loop supply chain for deteriorating products under stochastic container return times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-40.
    21. Li, Gendao & Reimann, Marc & Zhang, Weihua, 2018. "When remanufacturing meets product quality improvement: The impact of production cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 913-925.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:367-:d:714347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.