IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p149-d709896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Application of Lean Best Practices in Remanufacturing: Empirical Insights into the Benefits and Barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Elzbieta Pawlik

    (Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK)

  • Winifred Ijomah

    (Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK)

  • Jonathan Corney

    (School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK)

  • Daryl Powell

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7034 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Remanufacturing processes have been widely identified as being important elements of a sustainable economy. However, the commercial viability of this product recovery route is significantly influenced by several operational challenges that are different from those that occur in conventional manufacturing. One of the most widely used systematic process improvement methods in conventional manufacturing is lean production, which seeks to minimize all forms of waste throughout an operation. As the academic study of lean best practices in remanufacturing processes is relatively new, there is a lack of knowledge regarding implementation and impact. As such, this paper presents multiple case studies investigating the application of lean methods in industrial remanufacturing operations. These studies focus on the automotive industry, where both conventional and remanufacturing operations have been the leading adopters of lean thinking and practice. The results of the investigation identify specific lean methods that help manage the inherent complexity of the remanufacturing processes, and consequently improve the overall productivity of the process. Similarly, factors that limit the application of lean practices within remanufacturing are also identified and discussed. Matrices for opportunities and threats are developed to enable the simple adoption of these findings. Overall, the research provides a more holistic understanding of the application of lean within a remanufacturing environment, with benefits for both academia and industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Elzbieta Pawlik & Winifred Ijomah & Jonathan Corney & Daryl Powell, 2021. "Exploring the Application of Lean Best Practices in Remanufacturing: Empirical Insights into the Benefits and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:149-:d:709896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2018. "Assessing the economic and environmental impact of remanufacturing: a decision support tool for OEM suppliers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1662-1674, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prosman, Ernst Johannes & Cagliano, Raffaella, 2022. "A contingency perspective on manufacturing configurations for the circular economy: Insights from successful start-ups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    3. Gunasekara, Lahiru & Robb, David J. & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "New Circular Networks in Resilient Supply Chains: An External Capital Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Nancy Bocken & Lars Strupeit & Katherine Whalen & Julia Nußholz, 2019. "A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Georgios Lanaras-Mamounis & Anastasios Kipritsis & Thomas A. Tsalis & Konstantinos Ι. Vatalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2022. "A Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Firms to Circular Economy: a Triple-Level Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 883-902, September.
    7. Ipek Kazancoglu & Yigit Kazancoglu & Emel Yarimoglu & Aysun Kahraman, 2020. "A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1477-1492, September.
    8. Li Bai & F. Javier Sendra Garcia & Arunodaya Raj Mishra, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Adoption of the sustainable circular supply chain under disruptions risk in manufacturing industry using an integrated fuzzy decision-making approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 743-759, December.
    9. Yafeng Han & Tetiana Shevchenko & Bernard Yannou & Meisam Ranjbari & Zahra Shams Esfandabadi & Michael Saidani & Ghada Bouillass & Kseniia Bliumska-Danko & Guohou Li, 2023. "Exploring How Digital Technologies Enable a Circular Economy of Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lathifah, Artya, 2022. "Ordering and waste reuse decisions in a make-to-order system under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1290-1303.
    11. Cui, Yongfeng & Liu, Wei & Rani, Pratibha & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Internet of Things (IoT) adoption barriers for the circular economy using Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-CoCoSo decision-making approach in the manufacturing sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Dwivedi, Ashish & Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel José & de Carvalho, Daniel Estima, 2022. "Integrating the circular economy and industry 4.0 for sustainable development: Implications for responsible footwear production in a big data-driven world," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    13. Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Parkes, Geoff & Tuyet, Nguyen Thi Anh & Long, Dang Duc & Ha, Tran Phuong, 2022. "Impact of Organisational Factors on the Circular Economy Practices and Sustainable Performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Vietnam," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 362-378.
    14. Fang, Chang & Fan, Shuyi & Chi, Mingxiang & Wang, Weizhong, 2023. "The optimal remanufacturing strategy, returned quality choice and independent remanufacturers’ advantage for tackling extreme weather," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    15. Danni Zhang & Regina Frei & Gary Wills & Enrico Gerding & Steffen Bayer & Prince Kwame Senyo, 2023. "Strategies and practices to reduce the ecological impact of product returns: An environmental sustainability framework for multichannel retail," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4636-4661, November.
    16. Johan Vogt Duberg & Jelena Kurilova‐Palisaitiene & Erik Sundin, 2023. "5‐step approach for initiating remanufacturing (5AFIR)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4360-4370, November.
    17. Anna Luthin & Marzia Traverso & Robert H. Crawford, 2024. "Circular life cycle sustainability assessment: An integrated framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 41-58, February.
    18. Sung Hoon Chung & Robert D. Weaver & Hyun Woo Jeon, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Remanufacturing in Dynamic Supply Chains," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 703-731, September.
    19. Simonetto, Marco & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Battini, Daria & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    20. Luttiely Santos Oliveira & Ricardo Luiz Machado, 2021. "Application of optimization methods in the closed-loop supply chain: a literature review," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 357-400, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:149-:d:709896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.