IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5112-d548205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instrumentalization of a Model for the Evaluation of the Level of Satisfaction of Graduates under an E-Learning Methodology: A Case Analysis Oriented to Postgraduate Studies in the Environmental Field

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo García Villena

    (Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
    Department of Environment and Sustainability, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI-PR), Arecibo 00613, Puerto Rico)

  • Silvia Pueyo-Villa

    (Department of Languages and Education, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
    Department of Language, Education and Communications Sciences, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI-PR), Arecibo 00613, Puerto Rico)

  • Irene Delgado Noya

    (Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
    Department of Project Management, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI-MX), Campeche 24560, Mexico)

  • Kilian Tutusaus Pifarré

    (Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain
    Department of Environment and Sustainability, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI-PR), Arecibo 00613, Puerto Rico)

  • Roberto Ruíz Salces

    (Higher Polytechnic School, Universidad Europea del Atlántico (UNEATLANTICO), Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain)

  • Alina Pascual Barrera

    (Department of Project Management, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana (UNINI-MX), Campeche 24560, Mexico
    Area of Environmental Engineering, Universidade Internacional do Cuanza, Rua Padre Fidalgo s/n, Municipio do Cuito, Bié, Bairro Sede (6335,09 km), Angola)

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to evaluate the level of satisfaction of a sample of graduates in relation to different online postgraduate programs in the environmental area, as part of the process of continuous improvement in which the educational institution was immersed for the renewal of its accreditation before the corresponding official bodies. Based on the bibliographic review of a series of models and tools, a Likert scale measurement instrument was developed. This instrument, once applied and validated, showed a good level of reliability, with more than three quarters of the participants having a positive evaluation of satisfaction. Likewise, to facilitate the relational study, and after confirming the suitability of performing a factor analysis, four variable grouping factors were determined, which explained a good part of the variability of the instrument’s items. As a result of the analysis, it was found that there were significant values of low satisfaction in graduates from the Eurasian area, mainly in terms of organizational issues and academic expectations. On the other hand, it was observed that the methodological aspects of the “Auditing” and “Biodiversity” programs showed higher levels of dissatisfaction than the rest, with no statistically significant relationships between gender, entry profile or age groups. The methodology followed and the rigor in determining the validity and reliability of the instrument, as well as the subsequent analysis of the results, endorsed by the review of the documented information, suggest that the instrument can be applied to other multidisciplinary programs for decision making with guarantees in the educational field.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo García Villena & Silvia Pueyo-Villa & Irene Delgado Noya & Kilian Tutusaus Pifarré & Roberto Ruíz Salces & Alina Pascual Barrera, 2021. "Instrumentalization of a Model for the Evaluation of the Level of Satisfaction of Graduates under an E-Learning Methodology: A Case Analysis Oriented to Postgraduate Studies in the Environmental Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5112-:d:548205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5112-:d:548205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.