IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4856-d543675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation Using the Life Cycle Assessment Method

Author

Listed:
  • Xuejie Deng

    (School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
    Kailuan (Group) Co. Ltd., Tangshan 063018, China)

  • Yu Li

    (School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hao Liu

    (School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yile Zhao

    (School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yinchao Yang

    (Kailuan (Group) Co. Ltd., Tangshan 063018, China)

  • Xichen Xu

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xiaohui Cheng

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Benjamin de Wit

    (Smith School of Business, Queen’s University, Toronto, ON M5V 3K2, Canada)

Abstract

Microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a new geotechnical engineering technology used to strengthen soils and other materials. Although it is considered to be environmentally friendly, there is a lack of quantitative data and objective evaluation to support conclusions about its environmental impact. In this paper, the energy consumption and carbon emissions of MICP technology are quantitatively analyzed by using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. The environmental effects of MICP technology are evaluated from the perspectives of resource consumption and environmental impact. The results show that for each tonne of calcium carbonate produced by MICP technology, 1.8 t standard coal is consumed and 3.4 t CO 2 is produced, among which 80.4% of the carbon emissions and 96% of the energy consumption come from raw materials. Comparing using MICP with cement, lime, and sintered brick, the current MICP application process consumes less non-renewable resources but has a greater environmental impact. The major environmental impact that MICP has is the production of smoke and ash, with secondary impacts being global warming, photochemical ozone creation, acidification, and eutrophication. In five potential application scenarios of MICP, including concrete, sintered brick, lime mortar, mine cemented backfill, and foundation reinforcement, the carbon emissions of MICP are 3 to 7 times greater than the emissions of traditional technologies. The energy consumption is 15 to 23 times. Based on the energy consumption and carbon emissions characteristics of MICP technology at the current condition, suggestions are given for the future research of MICP.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuejie Deng & Yu Li & Hao Liu & Yile Zhao & Yinchao Yang & Xichen Xu & Xiaohui Cheng & Benjamin de Wit, 2021. "Examining Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation Using the Life Cycle Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4856-:d:543675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4856/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4856/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Castorina S. Vieira, 2022. "Sustainability in Geotechnics through the Use of Environmentally Friendly Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-7, January.
    2. Carles Manera & Eloi Serrano & José Pérez-Montiel & Màrian Buil-Fabregà, 2021. "Construction of Biophysical Indicators for the Catalan Economy: Building a New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4856-:d:543675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.