IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4710-d541641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Damage Assessment of Historical Masonry Churches Subjected to Moderate Intensity Seismic Shaking

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Ruggieri

    (Superintendence of Archeology, Fine Arts and Landscape for the Province of Cosenza, Piazza dei Valdesi, 13, 87100 Cosenza, Italy)

Abstract

An earthquake of magnitude 4.3 MW struck Cosenza (Calabria region, South Italy) and its immediate area on 24 February 2020. Although no damage was reported to ordinary masonry buildings, the ancient masonry churches suffered widespread damage. The herein article presents an analysis of the failures suffered by monumental buildings (e.g., churches) following a moderate seismic action. The contribution is based on the in situ damage observation of 14 churches, with a dating ranging from the 12th to 20th century. The study consists of a first phase, in which the different damage modes are identified, describing their causes and effects, and a second phase that correlates the damage detected to the main parameters that influence the seismic response of the churches (geometric characteristics, boundary condition, masonry and floor organization, past interventions, etc.), regardless of the state of conservation that was discrete for all buildings before the telluric event. From the rapid visual survey, the “weight” of each seismic parameter on the type of damage detected was then established. The past “retrofitting” interventions were decisive in the response of the ancient structure, with particular regard to those that made an aggravation of seismic mass and an increase in stiffness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Ruggieri, 2021. "Damage Assessment of Historical Masonry Churches Subjected to Moderate Intensity Seismic Shaking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4710-:d:541641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4710/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4710/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ho-Soo Kim & Dong-Kwan Kim & Geon-Woo Jeon & Sang-Sun Jo & Se-Hyun Kim, 2021. "Seismic Behavior of Stone Pagoda Structure by Shaking Table Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Paolo Belardi & Vittorio Gusella & Riccardo Liberotti & Camilla Sorignani, 2022. "Built Environment’s Sustainability: The Design of the Gypso|TechA of the University of Perugia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4710-:d:541641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.