Author
Listed:
- Abdullah Al Mahmud
(On-Farm Research Division (OFRD), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gaibandha 5700, Bangladesh)
- Mohamed M. Hassan
(Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)
- Md Jahangir Alam
(On-Farm Research Division (OFRD), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gaibandha 5700, Bangladesh)
- Md Samim Hossain Molla
(OFRD, BARI, Rangpur 5400, Bangladesh)
- Md Akkas Ali
(OFRD, BARI, Joydebpur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Haridas Chandra Mohanta
(Regional Horticulture Research Centre, BARI, Chapainawabganj 6300, Bangladesh)
- Md Shahidul Alam
(OFRD, BARI, Bogra 5800, Bangladesh)
- Md Aminul Islam
(OFRD, BARI, Bogra 5800, Bangladesh)
- Md Alamin Hossain Talukder
(OFRD, BARI, Rangpur 5400, Bangladesh)
- Md Zannatul Ferdous
(OFRD, BARI, Rangpur 5400, Bangladesh)
- Md Ruhul Amin
(OFRD, BARI, Manikganj 1801, Bangladesh)
- Md Faruque Hossain
(OFRD, BARI, Joydebpur 1701, Bangladesh)
- Md Mazharul Anwar
(OFRD, BARI, Rajshahi 6201, Bangladesh)
- Md Shahidul Islam
(OFRD, BARI, Bhola 8300, Bangladesh)
- Eldessoky S. Dessoky
(Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)
- Akbar Hossain
(Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh)
Abstract
The study aimed to select high-yielding, farmers-preferred quality sweet potato varieties that are suitable to grow in various environmental conditions in Bangladesh. In this context, four popular sweet potato varieties (viz., ‘BARI Mistialu-8′, ‘BARI Mistialu-12′, ‘BARI Mistialu-14′, and ‘BARI Mistialu-15′) were used in the study. These varieties were released by Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI). In the first season (2018–2019), these varieties were evaluated at nine locations, and in the second season (2019–2020), the same varieties were tested further, but only in three locations. The trial was set up in a randomized complete block design and repeated three times. After two years of observation, it was found that the fresh root yield was varied significantly due to the environment (E), genotypes (G), and their (G × E) interaction ( p ≤ 0.01) by using genotype and genotype x environment (GGE) biplot analysis. The E and G × E interaction effects were found to the greater than the genotypes effect solely. In the first year, three varieties, namely ‘BARI Mistialu-8′, ‘BARI Mistialu-12′ and ‘BARI Mistialu-14′, were identified as balanced and comparatively higher in yield in nine locations. These three varieties also showed a similar trend with respect to root yield in tested three locations in the second year. Among the four varieties, ‘BARI Mistialu-12′ was found to be the highest root yielder, followed by ‘BARI Mistialu-8′ and ‘BARI Mistialu-14′. Across the locations, these varieties showed 57.89%, 61.50% and 44.30% higher yield than the local check cultivar. Therefore, these three varieties may be recommended as the best varieties of sweet potato throughout the country.
Suggested Citation
Abdullah Al Mahmud & Mohamed M. Hassan & Md Jahangir Alam & Md Samim Hossain Molla & Md Akkas Ali & Haridas Chandra Mohanta & Md Shahidul Alam & Md Aminul Islam & Md Alamin Hossain Talukder & Md Zanna, 2021.
"Farmers’ Preference, Yield, and GGE-Biplot Analysis-Based Evaluation of Four Sweet Potato ( Ipomoea batatas L.) Varieties Grown in Multiple Environments,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3730-:d:525093
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Fekadu Gurmu, 2017.
"Stability Analysis of Fresh Root Yield of Sweetpotato in Southern Ethiopia using GGE Bi-Plot,"
International Journal of Pure Agricultural Advances, Pacharapa Naka, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9.
- Jahirul Islam & Sun Phil Choi & Obyedul Kalam Azad & Ji Woong Kim & Young-Seok Lim, 2020.
"Evaluation of Tuber Yield and Marketable Quality of Newly Developed Thirty-Two Potato Varieties Grown in Three Different Ecological Zones in South Korea,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
- Fekadu Gurmu, 2017.
"Stability Analysis of Fresh Root Yield of Sweetpotato in Southern Ethiopia using GGE Bi-Plot,"
International Journal of Pure Agricultural Advances, Online Science Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Xing, Yingying & Zhang, Teng & Jiang, Wenting & Li, Peng & Shi, Peng & Xu, Guoce & Cheng, Shengdong & Cheng, Yuting & Fan, Zhang & Wang, Xiukang, 2022.
"Effects of irrigation and fertilization on different potato varieties growth, yield and resources use efficiency in the Northwest China,"
Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3730-:d:525093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.