IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2537-d506495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent Advances in Mycotoxin Analysis and Detection of Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Grapes and Derived Products

Author

Listed:
  • Dimosthenis Kizis

    (Laboratory of Mycology, Scientific Directorate of Phytopathology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, St. Delta 8, 14561 Kifissia, Greece)

  • Aikaterini-Eleni Vichou

    (Laboratory of Mycology, Scientific Directorate of Phytopathology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, St. Delta 8, 14561 Kifissia, Greece)

  • Pantelis I. Natskoulis

    (Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organisation DEMETER, Sofokli Venizelou 1, 14123 Lycovrissi, Greece)

Abstract

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites of filamentous fungi that can cause toxic effects in human and animal health. Most of the filamentous fungi that produce these mycotoxins belong to four genera, namely, Aspergillus , Penicillium , Fusarium , and Alternaria . Mycotoxigenic fungi, along with mycotoxins, create a constant and serious economic threat for agriculture in many terms, counting product losses due to crop contamination and food spoilage, as well malnutrition when considering nutritional quality degradation. Given the importance of robust and precise diagnostics of mycotoxins and the related producing fungi in the grape food chain, one of the most important agricultural sectors worldwide, the present review initially delivers a comprehensive presentation of mycotoxin reports on grape and derived products, including a wide range of commodities such as fresh grapes, raisins, wine, juices, and other processed products. Next, based on worldwide regulations’ requirements for mycotoxins, and referring to the relative literature, this work presents methodological approaches for mycotoxin determination, and stresses major methods for the detection of fungal species responsible for mycotoxin production. The principle of function and basic technical background on the available analytical and molecular biology techniques developed—including chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunochemical-based assays, biosensors, and molecular assays—is briefly given, and references for their application to grape and derived product testing are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimosthenis Kizis & Aikaterini-Eleni Vichou & Pantelis I. Natskoulis, 2021. "Recent Advances in Mycotoxin Analysis and Detection of Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Grapes and Derived Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2537-:d:506495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2537/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2537/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Maaß & Nicola Consmüller & Hella Kehlenbeck, 2019. "Socioeconomic Impact of Genome Editing on Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of Fungal-Resistant and Coeliac-Safe Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Lukas Beule & Ena Lehtsaar & Anna Rathgeb & Petr Karlovsky, 2019. "Crop Diseases and Mycotoxin Accumulation in Temperate Agroforestry Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmuchowski, Wojciech & Baczewska-Dąbrowska, Aneta H. & Gworek, Barbara, 2024. "The role of temperate agroforestry in mitigating climate change: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Maya Sollen-Norrlin & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Naomi Laura Jane Rintoul, 2020. "Agroforestry Benefits and Challenges for Adoption in Europe and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2537-:d:506495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.