IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2207-d501571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Opportunities to Reduce Waste in Operating Rooms

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Harding

    (Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Joren Van Loon

    (Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Ingrid Moons

    (Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
    Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Economics, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Gunter De Win

    (Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Center (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
    Department of Urology, University Hospital Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium)

  • Els Du Bois

    (Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

While taking care of the population’s health, hospitals generate mountains of waste, which in turn causes a hazard to the environment of the population. The operating room is responsible for a disproportionately big amount of hospital waste. This research aims to investigate waste creation in the operating room in order to identify design opportunities to support waste reduction according to the circular economy. Eight observations and five expert interviews were conducted in a large sized hospital. The hospital’s waste infrastructure, management, and sterilization department were mapped out. Findings are that washable towels and operation instruments are reused; paper, cardboard, and specific fabric are being recycled; and (non-)hazardous medical waste is being incinerated. Observation results and literature findings are largely comparable, stating that covering sheets of the operation bed, sterile clothing, sterile packaging, and department-specific products are as well the most used and discarded. The research also identified two waste hotspots: the logistical packaging (tertiary, secondary, and primary) of products and incorrect sorting between hazardous and non-hazardous medical waste. Design opportunities include optimization of recycling and increased use of reusables. Reuse is the preferred method, more specifically by exploring the possibilities of reuse of textiles, consumables, and packaging.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Harding & Joren Van Loon & Ingrid Moons & Gunter De Win & Els Du Bois, 2021. "Design Opportunities to Reduce Waste in Operating Rooms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2207-:d:501571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joren Van Loon & Lore Veelaert & Sander Van Goethem & Regan Watts & Stijn Verwulgen & Jouke C. Verlinden & Els Du Bois, 2021. "Reuse of Filtering Facepiece Respirators in the COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiufen Xie & Yan Hong & Xianyi Zeng & Xiaoqun Dai & Melissa Wagner, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review for the Recycling and Reuse of Wasted Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Else F. de Ridder & Herman J. Friedericy & Anne C. van der Eijk & Jenny Dankelman & Frank Willem Jansen, 2022. "A New Method to Improve the Environmental Sustainability of the Operating Room: Healthcare Sustainability Mode and Effect Analysis (HSMEA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2207-:d:501571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.