IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1834-d495649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Placement of Water Quality Sensor for Long-Distance Water Transfer Projects Based on Multi-Objective Optimization and Uncertainty Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Li

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Jinggang Chu

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Guozhen Wei

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
    Environmental Research Institute, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Sifan Jin

    (School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Tiantian Yang

    (Dalian Smart Water Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian 116024, China)

  • Bo Li

    (Dalian Smart Water Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian 116024, China)

Abstract

It is important to place water quality sensors along open channels in long-distance water transfer projects optimally for rapid source identification and efficient management of sudden water contamination. A new framework which considers multiple objectives, including earliest detection time, lowest missing detection rate and lowest sensor cost, and combines the randomness of injected contaminant type and contaminant incident consisting of contaminant intrusion location, time and mass, was established to obtain optimal placement of water quality sensor with better robustness in this paper. The middle route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China was chosen as a case study, and it was found that both missing detection rate and detection time decrease with sensor cost gradually; furthermore, given the higher detecting precision, the detection accuracy and efficiency would be improved, a smaller number of water quality sensors would be needed, and the ten key placement positions where sensor with different detecting precision placed could be identified. Under the constraints of the allowable maximum missing detection rate, 1.00%, and detection time, 120.00 min, the detecting precision of 0.20 mg/L and 38 sensors placed could be selected as the optimal sensor placement scheme. Finally, with the consideration of contaminant uncertainty, the sensor placement scheme with better robustness could be constructed. The proposed framework would be helpful in solving the problem of water quality sensor placement with high practicality and efficiency in long-distance water transfer projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Li & Jinggang Chu & Guozhen Wei & Sifan Jin & Tiantian Yang & Bo Li, 2021. "Robust Placement of Water Quality Sensor for Long-Distance Water Transfer Projects Based on Multi-Objective Optimization and Uncertainty Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1834-:d:495649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1834/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1834/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khlaifi, Anis & Ionescu, Anda & Candau, Yves, 2009. "Pollution source identification using a coupled diffusion model with a genetic algorithm," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(12), pages 3500-3510.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Rui & Liu, Yan-Kui, 2010. "Modeling data envelopment analysis by chance method in hybrid uncertain environments," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 80(5), pages 922-950.
    2. Maciel, Leandro & Gomide, Fernando & Ballini, Rosangela, 2016. "A differential evolution algorithm for yield curve estimation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 10-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1834-:d:495649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.