IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1686-d493333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Pollution Assessment in China: A Novel Group Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model under Uncertain Information

Author

Listed:
  • Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh

    (Department of Mathematics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 81595-158, Iran)

  • Yong Tan

    (Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Huddersfield Business School, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Peter Wanke

    (COPPEAD Graduate Business School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 28 20520-120 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

  • Seyed Mohammadreza Loghmanian

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mobarakeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh, Isfahan 19615-1194, Iran)

Abstract

Assessment of and controlling air pollution are urgent global issues where international cooperation is deemed necessary. Although a very relevant data source can be obtained through continuous monitoring of air quality, measuring air pollutant concentrations is quite difficult when compared to other environmental indicators. We mainly have three different aims for the current study: (1) we propose the computation of the interval weights of decision makers (DMs) based on a group multiple criteria decision making (GMCDM) model; (2) we aim to rank the overall preferences of DMs by the possibility concepts; (3) we aim to evaluate the air quality in China using the most recent data based on our proposed method. We consider three monitoring stations, namely Luhu Park, Wanqingsha, and Tianhu, and the data for SO 2 , NO 2 , and PM 10 are collected for November 2017, 2018, and 2019. The results from our innovative model show that November 2019 had the best air quality. Finally, robustness analyses are also performed to confirm the discriminatory power of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh & Yong Tan & Peter Wanke & Seyed Mohammadreza Loghmanian, 2021. "Air Pollution Assessment in China: A Novel Group Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model under Uncertain Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1686-:d:493333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1686/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1686/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Yuan, Yan, 2015. "China's regional sustainability and diversified resource allocation: DEA environmental assessment on economic development and air pollution," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 239-256.
    2. Qingyong Wang & Hong-Ning Dai & Hao Wang, 2017. "A Smart MCDM Framework to Evaluate the Impact of Air Pollution on City Sustainability: A Case Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, May.
    3. H. Theil, 1963. "On the Symmetry Approach to the Committee Decision Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 380-393, April.
    4. S. Saffarzadeh & A. Hadi-Vencheh & A. Jamshidi, 2019. "An Interval Based Score Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problems," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1667-1687, September.
    5. Chi Zhang, 2017. "Population in China," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(8), pages 1333-1334, September.
    6. Ralph L. Keeney & Craig W. Kirkwood, 1975. "Group Decision Making Using Cardinal Social Welfare Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 430-437, December.
    7. Gabriele Battista & Tiziano Pagliaroli & Luca Mauri & Carmine Basilicata & Roberto De Lieto Vollaro, 2016. "Assessment of the Air Pollution Level in the City of Rome (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L. S., 1994. "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 249-265, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Sekula & Zbigniew Ustrnul & Anita Bokwa & Bogdan Bochenek & Miroslaw Zimnoch, 2022. "Random Forests Assessment of the Role of Atmospheric Circulation in PM 10 in an Urban Area with Complex Topography," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-43, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaled Jabeur & Jean-Marc Martel & Slim Ben Khélifa, 2004. "A Distance-Based Collective Preorder Integrating the Relative Importance of the Group's Members," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 327-349, July.
    2. Mateos, A. & Jimenez, A. & Rios-Insua, S., 2006. "Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1842-1864, November.
    3. Qiang Yang & Ping-an Du & Yong Wang & Bin Liang, 2017. "A rough set approach for determining weights of decision makers in group decision making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Khaled Jabeur & Jean-Marc Martel, 2010. "An Agreement Index with Respect to a Consensus Preorder," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 571-590, November.
    5. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    6. Kim, Soung Hie & Choi, Sang Hyun & Kim, Jae Kyeong, 1999. "An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 139-152, October.
    7. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 521-530.
    8. Xu, Zeshui, 2005. "Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 249-254, June.
    9. Ni Li & Minghui Sun & Zhuming Bi & Zeya Su & Chao Wang, 2014. "A new methodology to support group decision-making for IoT-based emergency response systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 953-977, November.
    10. Qiong Xia & Min Li & Huaqing Wu & Zhenggang Lu, 2016. "Does the Central Government’s Environmental Policy Work? Evidence from the Provincial-Level Environment Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    12. Forman, Ernest & Peniwati, Kirti, 1998. "Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 165-169, July.
    13. Rongwu Zhang & Wenqiang Fu & Yingxu Kuang, 2022. "Can Digital Economy Promote Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction in Heavily Polluting Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Ordoñez, Pablo J., 2020. "Power Plants, Air Pollution, and Health in Colombia," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304284, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Jia Zhang & Xiaoshu Chen & Shiwei Huang & Yi Wang & Wei Lin & Rui Zhou & He Zou, 2018. "Two-minute walk test: Reference equations for healthy adults in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-10, August.
    16. Zhongqiang Bai & Juanle Wang & Mingming Wang & Mengxu Gao & Jiulin Sun, 2018. "Accuracy Assessment of Multi-Source Gridded Population Distribution Datasets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Zihanxin Li & Nuoyan Li & Huwei Wen, 2021. "Digital Economy and Environmental Quality: Evidence from 217 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2015. "Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in U.S. north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 125-139.
    19. Henao, Felipe & Cherni, Judith A. & Jaramillo, Patricia & Dyner, Isaac, 2012. "A multicriteria approach to sustainable energy supply for the rural poor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 801-809.
    20. Zhen Wang & Mingzhi Hu & Yu Zhang & Zhuo Chen, 2022. "Housing Security and Settlement Intentions of Migrants in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1686-:d:493333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.