IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i2p479-d475968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discarded Cathode Ray Tube Glass as an Alternative for Aggregate in a Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Wielgus

    (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Marcin Górski

    (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Jan Kubica

    (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) glass belongs to the group of wastes which are hard to be recycled due to their toxic metals content. Geopolymers are relatively new environmentally friendly materials which allow for the use of different types of wastes within their matrix. The following paper combines both issues and presents a new geopolymer mixture containing discarded CRT glass as a replacement for an aggregate. The main goal of the paper is to describe the basic mechanical behavior of the new type of metakaolin-based geopolymer and to discuss different factors influencing it. After the preliminary research, the mixture containing 50% of CRT glass was chosen for further tests. However, according to results, CRT glass content has no evident influence on flexural or compressive strength. Summarizing the second part of the research, it was decided that the following parameters are optimal from the mechanical, economic and environmental points of view: metakaolin to CRT glass ratio 1:1 (by mass), CRT glass of size up to 4 mm, curing at the room temperature, sodium hydroxide concentration 10 mol/L. According to the authors, the presented geopolymer is a promising building material. Further tests shall be done to describe new material more precisely.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Wielgus & Marcin Górski & Jan Kubica, 2021. "Discarded Cathode Ray Tube Glass as an Alternative for Aggregate in a Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:479-:d:475968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao, Zhitong & Ling, Tung-Chai & Sarker, P.K. & Su, Weiping & Liu, Jie & Wu, Weihong & Tang, Junhong, 2018. "Recycling difficult-to-treat e-waste cathode-ray-tube glass as construction and building materials: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 595-604.
    2. Esther Obonyo & Elie Kamseu & Uphie C. Melo & Cristina Leonelli, 2011. "Advancing the Use of Secondary Inputs in Geopolymer Binders for Sustainable Cementitious Composites: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Kae-Long Lin & Kang-Wei Lo & Ta-Wui Cheng & Wei-Ting Lin & Ya-Wen Lin, 2020. "Utilization of Silicon Carbide Sludge as Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malindu Sandanayake & Yanni Bouras & Robert Haigh & Zora Vrcelj, 2020. "Current Sustainable Trends of Using Waste Materials in Concrete—A Decade Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-38, November.
    2. Yeou-Fong Li & Walter Chen & Ta-Wui Cheng, 2022. "The Sustainable Composite Materials in Civil and Architectural Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-3, February.
    3. Nicolas Youssef & Zoubeir Lafhaj & Christophe Chapiseau, 2020. "Economic Analysis of Geopolymer Brick Manufacturing: A French Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:479-:d:475968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.