IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p14016-d706035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Transportation Livability-Related Indicators for Green Urban Road Rating System in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Nam Hoai Tran

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No.1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Hsien Yang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No.1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

  • Calista Y. Tsai

    (Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No.1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

  • Nien Chia Yang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No.1 University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Ming Chang

    (Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C., No.342 Bade Road, Taipei City 105404, Taiwan)

Abstract

Although indicators in rating systems have been initiated to measure and promote the sustainability performance of roadway projects in some developed countries, applying those indicators to other regions/countries may still be difficult. In response to the United Nations’ sustainable development goals, local road agencies in Taiwan urgently need to establish systematic and quantifiable sustainable roadway strategies. As part of the project to develop a green urban road rating system in Taiwan, this study aims to develop transportation livability-related indicators (TLIs) and identify critical barriers to TLI application in Taiwan’s urban road system. To this end, the research employed an adaptive approach that integrates top-down and bottom-up approaches. The top-down approach included the comprehensive literature review and panel discussion to derive four TLIs and 21 corresponding requirements, and nine potential barriers to hold the indicator adoption. Four TLIs are pedestrian facilities, universal design, multimodal transportation, and utility facilities. The bottom-up approach used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assign weights to proposed indicators/requirements. Four critical barriers were also investigated through the Weighted Sum Model (WSM) method, namely unfavorable in-situ conditions, lack of stakeholders’ coordination, unsupported government policy and regulation, and limited budget and schedule. The findings can be beneficial to engineers and decisionmakers to enhance the livability standard of urban streets. The framework proposed in this research can be applied to other roadway characteristics aspects in different regions/countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nam Hoai Tran & Shih-Hsien Yang & Calista Y. Tsai & Nien Chia Yang & Chih-Ming Chang, 2021. "Developing Transportation Livability-Related Indicators for Green Urban Road Rating System in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:14016-:d:706035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/14016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/14016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grzegorz Ostasz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2022. "Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:14016-:d:706035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.