IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13952-d704692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency in Chinese Large Yellow Croaker Aquaculture: Implication for Sustainable Aquaculture in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yiyang Liu

    (School of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Sigbjorn Tveteras

    (Department of Safety, Economic and Planning, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Jinghua Xie

    (Norwegian School of Hotel Management, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
    School of Business and Economics, UiT/The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromso, Norway)

Abstract

Aquaculture supply from China has been a remedy to meet the growing global demand for seafood in the last decades. However, output growth has decreased dramatically in China in the 2000s. Previous literature focuses on the ecosystem problems arising in intensive farming in China. In this study, we used stochastic production analysis (SPA) to estimate the technical efficiency of Chinese large yellow croaker farming, which provides implications for impediments to the sustainable development of Chinese aquaculture. Data were collected from 430 large yellow croaker farmers in nine farming areas located along the coastline of southeastern China. The technical efficiency of large yellow croak farming is estimated to be 0.829, suggesting that farming is operated close to the production frontier with a maximal margin of 17% for improvement under the current technology. It further suggests that Chinese aquaculture growth is geared by conventional factors, expansion of fishing sites, and intensive farming, and is not sustainable under the constraint of farming areas and environmental problems in China. For the sustainable development of Chinese aquaculture, it is necessary to adopt new technology through innovation. The family-based farming model is a hinder to adopting new technology that requires systematic significant investment. Large-scale industrialized farming based on research and new technology development thus should be a modern trend in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiyang Liu & Sigbjorn Tveteras & Jinghua Xie, 2021. "Efficiency in Chinese Large Yellow Croaker Aquaculture: Implication for Sustainable Aquaculture in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13952-:d:704692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13952/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13952/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ransom A. Myers & Boris Worm, 2003. "Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 280-283, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing Ying & Ping Ying, 2023. "Analysis of Green Development of Aquaculture in China Based on Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Speirs, Douglas C. & Greenstreet, Simon P.R. & Heath, Michael R., 2016. "Modelling the effects of fishing on the North Sea fish community size composition," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 35-45.
    2. Staffan Waldo & Anton Paulrud, 2017. "Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fisheries: The Case of Multiple Regulatory Instruments in Sweden," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 275-295, October.
    3. Stephanie M. Sabbagh & Gordon M. Hickey, 2019. "Social Factors Affecting Sustainable Shark Conservation and Management in Belize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Bradley Chen & Victoria Y. Fan, 2015. "Strategic Provider Behavior Under Global Budget Payment with Price Adjustment in Taiwan," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(11), pages 1422-1436, November.
    5. Dana Miller & Stefano Mariani, 2013. "Irish fish, Irish people: roles and responsibilities for an emptying ocean," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 529-546, April.
    6. Nye, Janet A. & Gamble, Robert J. & Link, Jason S., 2013. "The relative impact of warming and removing top predators on the Northeast US large marine biotic community," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 157-168.
    7. Muallil, Richard N. & Mamauag, Samuel S. & Cababaro, Jeffrey T. & Arceo, Hazel O. & Aliño, Porfirio M., 2014. "Catch trends in Philippine small-scale fisheries over the last five decades: The fishers׳ perspectives," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 110-117.
    8. Maroto, Jose M. & Moran, Manuel, 2008. "Increasing marginal returns and the danger of collapse of commercially valuable fish stocks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 422-428, December.
    9. Blasiak, Robert, 2015. "Balloon effects reshaping global fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 18-20.
    10. Yi Zhang & Yao Xu & Hao Kong & Gang Zhou, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Coupling Coordination between Green Transformation and the Quality of Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    11. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas & Pham Van Ha, 2009. "Cod Today and None Tomorrow: The Economic Value of a Marine Reserve," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 85(3), pages 454-469.
    12. Vlad Rosca & Raluca Ignat, 2014. "The Sustainability of Fish Consumption in Romania: Customer Behaviour prior and after the Country`s Adherence to the EU," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 243-243, February.
    13. Ainsworth, C.H. & Pitcher, T.J. & Heymans, J.J. & Vasconcellos, M., 2008. "Reconstructing historical marine ecosystems using food web models: Northern British Columbia from Pre-European contact to present," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 354-368.
    14. Vera Nikolić & Zlatko Nedić & Dubravka Škraba Jurlina & Vesna Djikanović & Tamara Kanjuh & Ana Marić & Predrag Simonović, 2023. "Status and Perspectives of the Ichthyofauna of the Labudovo okno Ramsar Site: An Analysis of 14 Years of Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Gelcich, Stefan & Edwards-Jones, Gareth & Kaiser, Michel J., 2007. "Heterogeneity in fishers' harvesting decisions under a marine territorial user rights policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 246-254, March.
    16. Moses Majid Limuwa & Wales Singini & Trond Storebakken, 2018. "Is Fish Farming an Illusion for Lake Malawi Riparian Communities under Environmental Changes?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Sethi, Gautam & Costello, Christopher & Fisher, Anthony & Hanemann, Michael & Karp, Larry, 2005. "Fishery management under multiple uncertainty," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 300-318, September.
    18. Manning, Dale T. & Uchida, Hirotsugu, 2014. "Are Two Rents Better than None? When Monopoly Harvester Co-ops are Preferred to a Rent Dissipated Resource Sector," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 171628, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Mohamed Shainee & Cecilia Haskins & Harald Ellingsen & Bernt J. Leira, 2012. "Designing offshore fish cages using systems engineering principles," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 396-406, December.
    20. Flores, J.C., 2018. "Decreasing fractal dimensions as a strategy for oceanic wildlife conservation: Application to species with large migration patterns," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 30-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13952-:d:704692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.