IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13574-d697721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Tilapia–Freshwater Prawn Co-Culture Schemes in Tanks and Lake-Based Cages for Increased Farm Production

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rowena Robles Romana-Eguia

    (Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department, Binangonan Freshwater Station, Binangonan 1940, Rizal, Philippines)

  • Mildred Patito Rutaquio

    (Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department, Binangonan Freshwater Station, Binangonan 1940, Rizal, Philippines)

  • Reylan Caroscos Gutierrez

    (Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department, Binangonan Freshwater Station, Binangonan 1940, Rizal, Philippines)

  • Nerissa Diaz Salayo

    (Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, Aquaculture Department, Tigbauan Main Station, Tigbauan 5021, Iloilo, Philippines)

Abstract

The technical viability of tilapia (I-ExCEL strain Nile or red) and giant freshwater prawn (GFP) co-culture in cages-within-tanks was evaluated while appropriate feeding protocols for tilapia-GFP co-culture in cages in a eutrophic lake were determined. Specifically, production parameters in all test species grown for five months in tank co-culture (where only tilapias were fed) were compared, while the best feeding protocol from among the following treatments: (a) T fed —fed tilapias; (b) GFP fed —fed prawns and (c) T-GFP fed —both species fed, were defined. I-ExCEL Nile tilapias grew faster in tank co-culture whether reared singly or otherwise. However, red tilapia-GFP tank co-culture gave the best results considering key production traits in all test species (red tilapia —2.52%/day specific growth rate or SGR, 83.3% survival; GFP—1.17%/day SGR, 72.85% survival). Lake-based co-culture was technically feasible at stocking densities of 12.5/m 2 for tilapia and 2.4 to 4/m 2 for prawns even when only tilapias were fed; prawns grew to desired marketable sizes by thriving mainly on detritus and natural food organisms in the lake. However, further refinements can still be made to optimise the co-culture schemes to make them more sustainable and provide artisanal fish farmers options in increasing farm yields through multi-species aquaculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rowena Robles Romana-Eguia & Mildred Patito Rutaquio & Reylan Caroscos Gutierrez & Nerissa Diaz Salayo, 2021. "Assessment of Tilapia–Freshwater Prawn Co-Culture Schemes in Tanks and Lake-Based Cages for Increased Farm Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13574-:d:697721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tambalque, Hermogenes S. III & Perez, Maripaz L. & Nieves, Plutomeo M. & Corre, Valeriano L. & Duarte, Jude A. & Pulido, Neil A. & Dejarme, Henry E. & Tanay, Dennis D. & Garces, Len R., 2015. "Challenges and Opportunities for Giant Freshwater Prawn Culture through Participatory Learning and Fish Farmer Engagements," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Hermogenes S Tambalque III & Maripaz L. Perez & Plutomeo M. Nieves & Valeriano L. Corre & Jude A. Duarte & Neil A. Pulido & Henry E. Dejarme & Len R. Garces & Dennis D Tanay, 2015. "Challenges and Opportunities for Giant Freshwater Prawn Culture through Participatory Learning and Fish Farmer Engagements," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 12(1), pages 35-52, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13574-:d:697721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.