IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13567-d697535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture Processes: Pre-Combustion, Post-Combustion, and Oxy-Fuel Combustion Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Mahdi Kheirinik

    (Persian Gulf Star Oil Company, Bandar Abbas 7931181183, Iran)

  • Shaab Ahmed

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK)

  • Nejat Rahmanian

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK)

Abstract

Evaluation of economic aspects is one of the main milestones that affect taking rapid actions in dealing with GHGs mitigation; in particular, avoiding CO 2 emissions from large source points, such as power plants. In the present study, three kinds of capturing solutions for coal power plants as the most common source of electricity generation have been studied from technical and economic standpoints. Aspen HYSYS (ver.11) has been used to simulate the overall processes, calculate the battery limit, and assess required equipment. The Taylor scoring method has been utilized to calculate the costliness indexes, assessing the capital and investment costs of a 230 MW power plant using anthracite coal with and without post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion CO 2 capture technologies. Comparing the costs and the levelized cost of electricity, it was found that pre-combustion is more costly, to the extent that the total investment for it is approximately 1.6 times higher than the oxy-fuel process. Finally, post-combustion, in terms of maturity and cost-effectiveness, seems to be more attractive, since the capital cost and indirect costs are less. Most importantly, this can be applied to the existing plants without major disruption to the current operation of the plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahdi Kheirinik & Shaab Ahmed & Nejat Rahmanian, 2021. "Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Carbon Capture Processes: Pre-Combustion, Post-Combustion, and Oxy-Fuel Combustion Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13567-:d:697535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Sen & Gao, Hongxia & He, Chuan & Liang, Zhiwu, 2019. "Experimental evaluation of highly efficient primary and secondary amines with lower energy by a novel method for post-combustion CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 443-452.
    2. Chao, Cong & Deng, Yimin & Dewil, Raf & Baeyens, Jan & Fan, Xianfeng, 2021. "Post-combustion carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Taylor, J. H., 1977. "The 'process step scoring' method for making quick capital estimates," Engineering and Process Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 259-267, November.
    4. Li, Rongrong & Li, Shuyu, 2021. "Carbon emission post-coronavirus: Continual decline or rebound?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 57-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Ampomah & Anthony Morgan & Desmond Ofori Koranteng & Warden Ivan Nyamekye, 2024. "CCUS Perspectives: Assessing Historical Contexts, Current Realities, and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-57, August.
    2. Gregory Tarteh Mwenketishi & Hadj Benkreira & Nejat Rahmanian, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-42, December.
    3. Lin, Zeyu & Lu, Xinqian & Wang, Xiaoyan & Chang, Yuanhao & Kang, Kai & Zeng, Fanhua, 2024. "Effect of N2 impurity on CO2-based cyclic solvent injection process in enhancing heavy oil recovery and CO2 storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    4. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    5. Natália R. Galina & Gretta L. A. F. Arce & Mercedes Maroto-Valer & Ivonete Ávila, 2023. "Experimental Study on Mineral Dissolution and Carbonation Efficiency Applied to pH-Swing Mineral Carbonation for Improved CO 2 Sequestration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Xueyi & Yuan, Junjie & Yang, Chen & Deng, Gaofeng & Wang, Zhichao & Gao, Jubao, 2023. "Carbon dioxide separation performance evaluation of amine-based versus choline-based deep eutectic solvents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Vega, F. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Gallego Fernández, Luz M. & Portillo, E. & Navarrete, B. & Zhang, Zhien, 2020. "Current status of CO2 chemical absorption research applied to CCS: Towards full deployment at industrial scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Jia Liu & Shuo Li & Raf Dewil & Maarten Vanierschot & Jan Baeyens & Yimin Deng, 2022. "Water Splitting by MnO x /Na 2 CO 3 Reversible Redox Reactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Li, Qiangwei & Huang, Xin & Li, Nuo & Qi, Tieyue & Wang, Rujie & Wang, Lidong & An, Shanlong, 2024. "Energy-efficient biphasic solvents for industrial CO2 capture: Absorption mechanism and stability characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    5. Guan, Zepeng & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Sheikh, Muhammad Ramzan & Khan, Zeeshan & Gu, Xiao, 2023. "Unveiling the interconnectedness between energy-related GHGs and pro-environmental energy technology: Lessons from G-7 economies with MMQR approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    6. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    7. McLaughlin, Hope & Littlefield, Anna A. & Menefee, Maia & Kinzer, Austin & Hull, Tobias & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Griffiths, Steven, 2023. "Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Zhou, Xiaobin & Liu, Chao & Fan, Yinming & Zhang, Lihao & Tang, Shen & Mo, Shengpeng & Zhu, Yinian & Zhu, Zongqiang, 2022. "Energy-efficient carbon dioxide capture using a novel low-viscous secondary amine-based nonaqueous biphasic solvent: Performance, mechanism, and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    9. Lyu, Chen & Liu, Xiaoman & Wang, Zhen & Yang, Lu & Liu, Hao & Yang, Nan & Xu, Shaodong & Cao, Libin & Zhang, Zhe & Pang, Lingyun & Zhang, Li & Cai, Bofeng, 2023. "An emissions inventory using flight information reveals the long-term changes of aviation CO2 emissions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    10. Gunawan, Tubagus Aryandi & Luo, Hongxi & Greig, Chris & Larson, Eric, 2024. "Shared CO₂ capture, transport, and storage for decarbonizing industrial clusters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    11. Chen, S. & Shi, W.K. & Yong, J.Y. & Zhuang, Y. & Lin, Q.Y. & Gao, N. & Zhang, X.J. & Jiang, L., 2023. "Numerical study on a structured packed adsorption bed for indoor direct air capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Kim, Seonggon & Ko, Yunmo & Lee, Geun Jeong & Lee, Jae Won & Xu, Ronghuan & Ahn, Hyungseop & Kang, Yong Tae, 2023. "Sustainable energy harvesting from post-combustion CO2 capture using amine-functionalized solvents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    13. Adeel ur Rehman & Bhajan Lal, 2022. "RETRACTED: Gas Hydrate-Based CO 2 Capture: A Journey from Batch to Continuous," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Tian Zhao & Zhixin Liu, 2022. "Drivers of CO 2 Emissions: A Debt Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Szostok, Agnieszka & Stanek, Wojciech, 2023. "Thermo-ecological analysis of the power system based on renewable energy sources integrated with energy storage system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Chen, Shiyi & Zhou, Nan & Wu, Mudi & Chen, Shubo & Xiang, Wenguo, 2022. "Integration of molten carbonate fuel cell and chemical looping air separation for high-efficient power generation and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    17. Alberto Maria Gambelli, 2023. "CCUS Strategies as Most Viable Option for Global Warming Mitigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-4, May.
    18. Carminati, Hudson Bolsoni & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F., 2021. "Sustainable Gas-to-Wire via dry reforming of carbonated natural gas: Ionic-liquid pre-combustion capture and thermodynamic efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Brunke, Jean-Christian & Blesl, Markus, 2014. "A plant-specific bottom-up approach for assessing the cost-effective energy conservation potential and its ability to compensate rising energy-related costs in the German iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 431-446.
    20. Hoseinzade, Leila & Adams, Thomas A., 2019. "Techno-economic and environmental analyses of a novel, sustainable process for production of liquid fuels using helium heat transfer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 850-866.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13567-:d:697535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.