IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13017-d687258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmenting Design Education for Sustainability through Field Exploration: An Experience of Learning from DIY Practices in a Rural Community

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Raeva

    (Siberian Design Centre, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Svetlana Usenyuk-Kravchuk

    (Siberian Design Centre, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Anton Raev

    (Siberian Design Centre, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
    Industrial Design Department, Ural State University of Architecture and Art, 620075 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Irina Surina

    (Industrial Design Department, Ural State University of Architecture and Art, 620075 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Marina Fionova

    (Industrial Design Department, Ural State University of Architecture and Art, 620075 Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

This article (visual essay) provides a glimpse of a field trip ventured by design students as part of a larger study of developing a localised version of design education for sustainability, focusing on the wants and needs of non-urban populations in vast Russian hinterlands. The central goal is to introduce would-be designers to the concepts of locally appropriate technology and sustainable/circular living by real-life examples and, eventually, teach them to recognise the sustainable potential of place-based technologies and practices of their making, using and maintaining. The primary data came from the trip to Pozhva, a village in Permskiy Krai, Russia, that gained popularity among DIY activists and users of off-road vehicles in Russia in the early 2000s because of its unique, community-centred manufacture of lightweight ATVs on low-pressure tires, nicknamed “jeeps”. This article presents the students’ journey in a comic strip portraying a composite character of technologies and their user-designers as experts in local conditions and (subconsciously) agents of circularity. The article closes with a discussion on the expedition’s discoveries and learning outcomes, correlating them with broader implications for design education.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Raeva & Svetlana Usenyuk-Kravchuk & Anton Raev & Irina Surina & Marina Fionova, 2021. "Augmenting Design Education for Sustainability through Field Exploration: An Experience of Learning from DIY Practices in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13017-:d:687258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, Loren, 2013. "Lonely Ideas: Can Russia Compete?," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019795, April.
    2. Barsukova, Svetlana & Radaev, Vadim, 2012. "Informal economy in Russia: A brief overview," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 13(2), pages 4-12.
    3. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana, 2015. "The user dominated technology era: Dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 560-576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianping Huang & Yuheng Tao & Minghong Shi & Jun Wu, 2022. "Empirical Study on Design Trend of Taiwan (1960s–2020): The Evolution of Theme, Diversity and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantin Fursov & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2017. "Make it work!—a study of user innovation in Russia," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 392-402.
    2. Thévenot, Laurent, 2012. "Law, economies and economics: New critical perspectives on normative and evaluative devices in action," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 14(1), pages 4-10.
    3. Kivimaa, Paula & Boon, Wouter & Hyysalo, Sampsa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1062-1075.
    4. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Juntunen, Jouni K. & Martiskainen, Mari, 2018. "Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 872-885.
    5. Paula Kivimaa & Wouter Boon & Sampsa Hyysalo & Laurens Klerkx, 2017. "Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Transitions: a Systematic Review," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    6. Matti Grosse & Hendrik Send & Thomas Schildhauer, 2019. "Lessons Learned from Establishing the Energy-Informatics Business Model: Case of a German Energy Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Hyejin Park & Han Woo Park, 2018. "Research evaluation of Asian countries using altmetrics: comparing South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, and China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 771-788, November.
    8. Fursov, Konstantin & Thurner, Thomas & Nefedova, Alena, 2017. "What user-innovators do that others don't: A study of daily practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 153-160.
    9. Hyysalo, Sampsa & Usenyuk, Svetlana, 2015. "The user dominated technology era: Dynamics of dispersed peer-innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 560-576.
    10. repec:hig:wpaper:76hum2014 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Wouter Boon & Gerben de Vries & Alexander Peine, 2015. "User-technology interactions in the construction of user-driven configurations – lessons from Dutch civic energy communities," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 15-02, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Jun 2015.
    12. Lakomaa, Erik & Sanandaji, Tino, 2021. "Exploring collective consumer innovation in health care: Cases and formal modeling," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    13. Michael Ellman, 2015. "Russia’s Current Economic System: From Delusion to Glasnost," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 57(4), pages 693-710, December.
    14. Michael Rochlitz & Olga Masyutina & Koen Schoors & Yulia Khalikova, 2023. "Authoritarian durability, prospects of change and individual behavior: evidence from a survey experiment in Russia," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 23/1061, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    15. Svensson, Peter O. & Hartmann, Rasmus Koss, 2018. "Policies to promote user innovation: Makerspaces and clinician innovation in Swedish hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 277-288.
    16. Zoya Kotelnikova, 2013. "Structural embeddedness and contractual relationships of chain stores and their suppliers in Russian emerging markets," HSE Working papers WP BRP 22/SOC/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    17. Olmedilla, M. & Send, H. & Toral, S.L., 2019. "Identification of the unique attributes and topics within Smart Things Open Innovation Communities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 133-147.
    18. Hyo Chan Park & Jonghee M. Youn & Han Woo Park, 2019. "Global mapping of scientific information exchange using altmetric data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 935-955, March.
    19. Gregory Brock & Constantin Ogloblin, 2018. "Russian 1998–2007 TFP decomposed: some inspiration emerging from inherited Soviet legacy," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 135-151, May.
    20. Matti Grosse, 2018. "How User-Innovators Pave the Way for a Sustainable Energy Future: A Study among German Energy Enthusiasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    21. Svetlana Zemlyak & Alexey Naumenkov & Galina Khromenkova, 2022. "Measuring the Entrepreneurial Mindset: The Motivations behind the Behavioral Intentions of Starting a Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13017-:d:687258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.