IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12574-d678955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Huyen Trang Do Thi

    (Environmental and Process Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Peter Mizsey

    (Institute of Chemistry, University of Miskolc, Egyetemváros C/1 108, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary)

  • Andras Jozsef Toth

    (Environmental and Process Engineering Research Group, Department of Chemical and Environmental Process Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

In the COVID-19 pandemic period, the role of face masks is critical as a protective physical barrier to prevent droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects or against various environmental threats, including the SARS-Cov-2 virus. However, the plastic and microplastic waste from the used face masks pollute the environment, cause a negative impact on human health and the natural ecosystem, as well as increase landfill and medical waste. The presented paper focuses on providing an overview of the application of membrane technology in face mask products as well as the development of protection mechanisms in the future. The authors performed an environmental analysis of reusable (cloth) masks and disposable masks (surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators) using the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess the impacts on the environment, human health, and ecosystem. IMPACT 2002+ V2.14, ReCiPe 2016 Endpoint (H) V1.02, IPCC 2013 GWP 100a V1.03 methods were applied using specialized software (SimaPro V9.1). The disposable masks consistently provide higher protection, though they also carry several multiple environmental burdens. Conversely, reusable masks improve environmental performance, reduce 85% of waste, have a 3.39 times lower impact on climate change, and are 3.7 times cheaper than disposable masks.

Suggested Citation

  • Huyen Trang Do Thi & Peter Mizsey & Andras Jozsef Toth, 2021. "Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12574-:d:678955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng Wang & Christophe Guy & Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng & Chunjiang An, 2021. "A New Challenge for the Management and Disposal of Personal Protective Equipment Waste during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-4, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanaalsadat Eslami & Golam Kabir & Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng, 2023. "Waste Generation Modeling Using System Dynamics with Seasonal and Educational Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Aianna Rios Magalhães Véras e Silva & Bruna de Freitas Iwata & Maria do Socorro Ferreira dos Santos & José Machado Moita Neto, 2023. "Impacts and Regulations of Healthcare Solid Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12574-:d:678955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.