IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12175-d672069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Transforming Unused Urban Spaces to Social Housing for Self-Employed People in Ho Chi Minh City: An Architectural Space Design Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Le-Minh Ngo

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Hai-Binh Nguyen

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Thi-Phuong Uyen Nguyen

    (Research Center of Environment, Southern Institute of Social Sciences, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

  • Thi-Minh Dieu Nguyen

    (Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Hong Bang International University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam)

Abstract

As with many metropolitan areas, social housing (SH) provision, which can improve living standards and social welfare, is crucial for urban socio-economic development strategies in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC). However, there have been issues relating to promoting social housing in the Vietnamese context resulting from the property market and the design. The former is a failure to attract investors. The latter relates to lacking housing models for the mid- and low-income communities. Currently, many low-income families who have low access to the general job market in HCMC have to make a living by running their own business at home. This situation leads to low-income housing establishments in some residential areas. Thus, the planning approach in social housing needs to solve both the demand for low-cost housing and promoting self-employed activities. In this paper, mixed methods, including observation, questionnaires, interviews, data aggregation, and comparison, were conducted with supporting legal conditions and corresponding operating conditions to propose appropriate designs for the SH for self-employed people in HCMC. First, observing and analyzing urban spaces helped identify the unused urban areas that solve the investment issue. Then, after studying the development of social housing in different contexts via the questionnaire and in-depth interviews, self-employed households’ basic information and their business needs in using SH spaces were identified in some districts. Then, based on the legal framework and practical projects, optimal space designs were formed.

Suggested Citation

  • Le-Minh Ngo & Hai-Binh Nguyen & Thi-Phuong Uyen Nguyen & Thi-Minh Dieu Nguyen, 2021. "On Transforming Unused Urban Spaces to Social Housing for Self-Employed People in Ho Chi Minh City: An Architectural Space Design Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12175-:d:672069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Triana, Maria Andrea & Lamberts, Roberto & Sassi, Paola, 2015. "Characterisation of representative building typologies for social housing projects in Brazil and its energy performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 524-541.
    2. Yan Ling Chi & Hugo Wai Leung Mak, 2021. "From Comparative and Statistical Assessments of Liveability and Health Conditions of Districts in Hong Kong towards Future City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Renata Tubelo & Lucelia Rodrigues & Mark Gillott & May Zune, 2021. "Comfort within Budget: Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Envelope Improvements in Single-Family Affordable Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Viktor Bukovszki & Gabriella Dóci & András Reith, 2021. "Coding Engines in Participatory Social Housing Design—A Case to Revisit Pattern Languages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habib M. Alshuwaikhat & Yusuf A. Adenle & Thamer Almuhaidib, 2022. "A Lifecycle-Based Smart Sustainable City Strategic Framework for Realizing Smart and Sustainability Initiatives in Riyadh City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Walsh, Angélica & Cóstola, Daniel & Labaki, Lucila Chebel, 2018. "Performance-based validation of climatic zoning for building energy efficiency applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 416-427.
    3. Yu, Yanzhe & Cheng, Jie & You, Shijun & Ye, Tianzhen & Zhang, Huan & Fan, Man & Wei, Shen & Liu, Shan, 2019. "Effect of implementing building energy efficiency labeling in China: A case study in Shanghai," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Renata Tubelo & Lucelia Rodrigues & Mark Gillott & May Zune, 2021. "Comfort within Budget: Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Envelope Improvements in Single-Family Affordable Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Cubillos-González, Rolando-Arturo & Cardoso, Grace Tibério, 2021. "Affordable housing and clean technology transfer in construction firms in Brazil," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Jiemei Luo & Edwin H. W. Chan & Jinfeng Du & Linxia Feng & Peng Jiang & Ying Xu, 2022. "Developing a Health-Spatial Indicator System for a Healthy City in Small and Midsized Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. de Oliveira, Gisliany L.A. & Silva, Ivanovitch & Lima, Luciana & Costa, Daniel G., 2023. "A composite indicator of liveability based on sociodemographic and Uber quality service dimensions: A data-driven approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 97-115.
    8. David Bienvenido-Huertas & Miguel Oliveira & Carlos Rubio-Bellido & David Marín, 2019. "A Comparative Analysis of the International Regulation of Thermal Properties in Building Envelope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-30, October.
    9. Giorgia Sugoni & Vanessa Assumma & Marta Carla Bottero & Giulio Mondini, 2023. "Development of a Decision-Making Model to Support the Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Revision of the Municipal Plan of Turin (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Bowen Zhang & Weimin Guo & Zhaolian Xing & Ren Zhou, 2022. "Current Situation and Sustainable Renewal Strategies of Public Space in Chinese Old Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Eduardo Pierozan & Taylana Piccinini Scolaro & Elise Sommer Watzko & Enedir Ghisi, 2024. "Technical and Economic Feasibility of Multi-Family Social Housing and Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12175-:d:672069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.