IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12066-d669894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Mobile Food Delivery Applications during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Examine Continuance Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Van Dat Tran

    (Department of Marketing, Banking University, Ho Chi Minh 70000, Vietnam)

Abstract

COVID-19 has opened up a significant market for food delivery services in Vietnam. Based on the theory of planned behavior, subjective norms and social isolation were hypothesized to have a positive impact on behavior intention and continuance behavior. The study also aimed to determine the positive impacts of perceived food safety, food delivery, and behavioral intention on continuance behavior, while the perception of food safety and food delivery were also proposed to have direct impacts on behavioral intention. Structured equation modeling was used to evaluate data obtained from 299 respondents who were experienced in using delivery apps for ordering food. As a result, this study contributes to prior findings regarding the positive effects of the subject norm—social isolation, food delivery hygiene, perceived food safety—on behavioral intention to use mobile apps. Additionally, customers’ continued usage behavior was found to be also influenced by behavioral intention, perceived food safety, and food delivery hygiene. It was concluded that these findings have significant theoretical and practical implications. This study adds to the existing debate on consumer behavior in the context of online food delivery in Vietnam and sheds light on the elements that could be used to forecast people’s willingness to buy food through food delivery apps, and for how long they would continue to use them.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Dat Tran, 2021. "Using Mobile Food Delivery Applications during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Examine Continuance Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12066-:d:669894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Barry, 1998. "Social Exclusion, Social Isolation and the Distribution of Income," CASE Papers 012, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Barry, Brian, 1998. "Social exclusion, social isolation and the distribution of income," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6516, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Debanjan Banerjee & Mayank Rai, 2020. "Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(6), pages 525-527, September.
    4. Le Giang Nam & Nguyen Thi Thuan An, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Continuance Intention to Use Food Delivery Apps of The Millennials in Ho Chi Minh City," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 404-417, April.
    5. Jiwat Ram & Siyao Sun, 2020. "Business Benefits of Online-To-Offline Ecommerce: A Theory Driven Perspective," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 135-162.
    6. Brian Barry, 1998. "Social Exclusion, Social Isolation and the Distribution of Income," CASE Papers case12, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Li Bai & Mingliang Wang & Shunlong Gong, 2019. "Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Purchases: The Important Roles of Beliefs, Subjective Norms, and Identity Expressiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Jankit Chotigo & Yasuo Kadono, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Key Factors Encouraging Food Delivery App Adoption Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Suk Won Lee & Hye Jin Sung & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2019. "Determinants of Continuous Intention on Food Delivery Apps: Extending UTAUT2 with Information Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hadiqa Riaz & Vida Davidaviciene & Hassaan Ahmed & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2022. "Optimizing Customer Repurchase Intention through Cognitive and Affective Experience: An Insight of Food Delivery Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Gibson, Samantha & Hsu, Maxwell K. & Zhou, Xing, 2022. "Convenience stores in the digital age: A focus on the customer experience and revisit intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Su-Chen(Cecilia) Lin & Mei-Chen Chuang & Chen-Yuan Huang & Chia-En Liu, 2023. "Nursing Staff’s Behavior Intention to Use Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study Employing the UTAUT 2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Shiu-Li Huang & Huei-Ru Siao, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Implementation of Online Food Delivery and Its Impact on Restaurant Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Meena, Purushottam & Kumar, Gopal, 2022. "Online food delivery companies' performance and consumers expectations during Covid-19: An investigation using machine learning approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Sigitas Urbonavicius & Karina Adomaviciute – Sakalauske, 2023. "Learning from Pandemic Periods: Elements of the Theory of Behavioral Transformation," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 35(2), pages 251-266.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tania Burchardt & Julian Le Grand, 2002. "Constraint and Opportunity: Identifying Voluntary Non-Employment," CASE Papers case55, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Sommarat Chantarat & Christopher Barrett, 2012. "Social network capital, economic mobility and poverty traps," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 10(3), pages 299-342, September.
    3. Bingqin Li & Huamin Peng, 2006. "The Social Protection of Rural Workers in the Construction Industry in Urban China," CASE Papers case113, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    4. Hodgson, F. C. & Turner, J., 2003. "Participation not consumption: the need for new participatory practices to address transport and social exclusion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 265-272, October.
    5. Li, Bingqin & Peng, Huamin, 2006. "The social protection of rural workers in the construction industry in urban China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6226, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Andrew Postlewaite & Dan Silverman, 2005. "Social isolation and inequality," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 3(3), pages 243-262, December.
    7. Filgueira, Fernando & Furtado, Magdalena & Kaztman, Rubén, 2000. "New challenges for equity in Uruguay," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    8. Rambotti, Simone, 2015. "Recalibrating the spirit level: An analysis of the interaction of income inequality and poverty and its effect on health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 123-131.
    9. Lacayo, Carlos, 2004. "Análisis Comparativo de Sistemas de Monitoreo y Evaluación: El Caso de Nicaragua," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2205, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Caterina Ruggeri Laderchi & Ruhi Saith & Frances Stewart, 2003. "Does it Matter that we do not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 243-274.
    11. Lilavati Krishnan, 2015. "Social Exclusion, Mental Health, Disadvantage and Injustice," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 27(2), pages 155-173, September.
    12. Ruhi Saith, "undated". "Social Exclusion: the Concept and Application to Developing Countries," QEH Working Papers qehwps72, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    13. Tania Burchardt & Julian Le Grand, 2002. "Constraint and Opportunity: Identifying Voluntary Non-Employment," CASE Papers 055, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    14. Medel-Ramírez, Carlos & Medel-López, Hilario, 2017. "Proposed methodology for estimating the index of social exclusion: the case of indigenous population in the State of Veracruz Mexico," MPRA Paper 86656, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 12 Dec 2017.
    15. Claudiu-Ionuţ Popîrlan & Irina-Valentina Tudor & Constantin-Cristian Dinu & Gabriel Stoian & Cristina Popîrlan & Daniela Dănciulescu, 2021. "Hybrid Model for Unemployment Impact on Social Life," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Janice Du Mont & S Daisy Kosa & Hannah Kia & Charmaine Spencer & Mark Yaffe & Sheila Macdonald, 2020. "Development and evaluation of a social inclusion framework for a comprehensive hospital-based elder abuse intervention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Asif Hussain & David Fisher & Stephen Espiner, 2017. "Transport Infrastructure and Social Inclusion: A Case Study of Tourism in the Region of Gilgit-Baltistan," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 196-208.
    18. Julian Le Grand & Liz Richardson, 2002. "Outsider and Insider Expertise: The response of residents of deprived neighbourhoods to an academic definition of social exclusion," CASE Papers case57, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    19. Andrea Galeotti & Gerrit Müller, 2005. "Friendship Relations in the School Class and Adult Economic Attainment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-032/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 08 Aug 2005.
    20. Julian Le Grand & Liz Richardson, 2002. "Outsider and Insider Expertise: The response of residents of deprived neighbourhoods to an academic definition of social exclusion," CASE Papers 057, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12066-:d:669894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.