Author
Listed:
- Ming-Hsia Hsu
(Department of Information Management, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813414, Taiwan
Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804959, Taiwan)
- Chia-Mei Chen
(Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804959, Taiwan)
- Wang-Chuan Juang
(Quality Management Center, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813414, Taiwan
Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804959, Taiwan)
- Zheng-Xun Cai
(Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804959, Taiwan)
- Tsuang Kuo
(Department of Business Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804959, Taiwan)
Abstract
The trend towards personalized healthcare has led to an increase in applying deep learning techniques to improve healthcare service quality and sustainability. With the increasing number of patients with multiple comorbidities, they need comprehensive care services, where comprehensive care is a synonym for complete patient care to respond to a patient’s physical, emotional, social, economic, and spiritual needs, and, as such, an efficient prediction system for comprehensive care suggestions could help physicians and healthcare providers in making clinical judgement. The experiment dataset contained a total of 2.9 million electrical medical records (EMRs) from 250 thousand hospitalized patients collected retrospectively from a first-tier medical center in Taiwan, where the EMRs were de-identified and anonymized and where 949 cases had received comprehensive care. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are designed for analyzing time-series data but are still lacking in studying predicting personalized healthcare. Furthermore, in most cases, the collected evaluation data are imbalanced with a small portion of positive cases. This study examined the impact of imbalanced data in model training and suggested an effective approach to handle such a situation. To address the above-mentioned research issue, this study analyzed the care need in the different patient groupings, proposed a personalized care suggestion system by applying RNN models, and developed an efficient model training scheme for building AI-assisted prediction models. This study observed several findings: (1) the data resampling schemes could mitigate the impact of imbalanced data on model training, and the under-sampling scheme achieved the best performance with an ACC of 99.80%, a PPV of 70.18%, an NPV of 99.87%, a recall of 82.91%, and an F1 score of 0.7602, while the model trained with the original data had a very low PPV of 6.42% and a low F1 score of 0.1116; (2) patient clustering with multi-classier could predict comprehensive care needs efficiently with an ACC of 99.87%, a PPV of 77.90%, an NPV of 99.90%, a recall of 92.19%, and an F1 score of 0.8404; (3) the proposed long short-term memory (LSTM) prediction model achieved the best overall performance with an ACC of 99.80%, a PPV of 70.18%, an NPV of 99.87%, a recall of 82.91%, and an F1 score of 0.7602.
Suggested Citation
Ming-Hsia Hsu & Chia-Mei Chen & Wang-Chuan Juang & Zheng-Xun Cai & Tsuang Kuo, 2021.
"Analyzing Groups of Inpatients’ Healthcare Needs to Improve Service Quality and Sustainability,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11909-:d:666676
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11909-:d:666676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.