IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11858-d665637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstacles to Sustaining Diversity: Historical Context and Current Experiences of Underrepresented Minority Women and Men in Sociology and Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta M. Spalter-Roth

    (Center for Social Science Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA)

Abstract

White men predominate in the top ranks of the professorate, but recent efforts have attempted to decrease inequality and increase diversity in the academy by hiring more faculty, especially women of color. Have equality and diversity efforts worked or has negative departmental climate limited efforts to make diversity sustainable? Despite the long history of and many contributions by women of color (URC) as public intellectuals, activists, and founders of organizations to promote Blacks and Latino/a people, we find that much of their work is still marginalized and is not viewed as legitimate science. This treatment may lessen the ability to increase equality and sustain diversity in academic institutions. The paper tests whether URC women scholars are still experiencing inequalities in comparison to their male peers of color in two disciplines, that of sociology and economics. We include these two disciplines because of similarities in origin and of topics. First, we hypothesize that women of color have significantly more negative experiences in sociology and economics departments than do men of color, when other conditions are held constant. Second, we hypothesize that structural conditions, are related to experiential outcomes for these scholars. Third, we hypothesize that participation in minority-oriented organizations improves women of color’s experiences. Fourth, we hypothesize that interacting gender with participation in minority-oriented organizations, significantly improves women of color’s situation. The study results show that women of color continue to experience greater problems of access, marginality, inclusion, and harassment in sociology and economics departments. The sustainable development goals of achieving gender equality and increase educational opportunities cannot be achieve without addressing these inequities and inclusion issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta M. Spalter-Roth, 2021. "Obstacles to Sustaining Diversity: Historical Context and Current Experiences of Underrepresented Minority Women and Men in Sociology and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11858-:d:665637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Cavalieri, 2016. "Inside Institutions of Progressive-Era Social Sciences: The Interdisciplinarity of Economics and Sociology," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 345-361, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra L. Hanson & Enrique S. Pumar, 2022. "Moving toward Sustainability: Rethinking Gender Structures in Education and Occupation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-3, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11858-:d:665637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.