IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11282-d655012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Risk Assessment of Potential Toxic Elements in Salt Marshes on the East Coast of the Red Sea: Differential Physiological Responses and Adaptation Capacities of Dominant Halophytes

Author

Listed:
  • Farag Ibraheem

    (Biology/Chemistry Department, Al Qunfodah University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Al Qunfodah 21912, Saudi Arabia
    Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

  • Nawal Al-Hazmi

    (Biology/Chemistry Department, Al Qunfodah University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Al Qunfodah 21912, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohamed El-Morsy

    (Desert Research Center, Range Management Unit, Mataryia, Cairo 11753, Egypt
    Deanship of Scientific Research, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah Al Mukarramah 11715, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmed Mosa

    (Soils Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

Abstract

The impact of the mutual interactions between salinity and the phytoavailability of potential toxic elements (PTEs) on the adaptation of halophytes in their natural habitat is complex and far from clear. Herein, we aimed to evaluate salinity- and PTE-induced oxidative stress in selected halophytes and the antioxidant responses of these plants. For that, five salt marshes were selected, and the physiological responses of dominant halophytes ( Tamarix nilotica , Heliotropium crispum, Zygophyllum coccineum , Halopeplus perfoliata , and Avicennia marina ) were evaluated against the physicochemical features of their rhizosediments. The tested locations varied in their physicochemical properties and showed various levels of salinity stress and a low fertility status. Distinct variations in ten PTE concentrations were recognized among locations and within plants, with Cr and Co showing the highest ecological risk indices. The high levels of salinity and PTEs were associated with higher foliar levels of malondialdehyde, particularly in A. marina and Z. coccineum . The bio-concentration ratio revealed hyperaccumulating potentials of PTEs by the tested halophytes. Z. coccineum showed effective accumulation of Co, Fe, and Pb, while T. nilotica exhibited effective accumulation of Cu, Cd, and Zn. H. perfoliate had higher accumulation of Cr and Hg, whereas A. marina accumulated a significant amount of Hg, Cd, Zn, and Mn. H. crispum leaves accumulated the highest Ni levels among the tested halophytes. Altogether, our results highlight the potential risk of pollution of the tested areas with PTEs and the efficient physiological adaptation of each of the tested halophytes as a unique biological system. They also reflect the high capabilities of the tested halophytes as phytoextractors of their corresponding PTEs and their potential as efficient tools for phytoremediation of salt- and PTE-affected lands.

Suggested Citation

  • Farag Ibraheem & Nawal Al-Hazmi & Mohamed El-Morsy & Ahmed Mosa, 2021. "Ecological Risk Assessment of Potential Toxic Elements in Salt Marshes on the East Coast of the Red Sea: Differential Physiological Responses and Adaptation Capacities of Dominant Halophytes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11282-:d:655012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khaled Abdelaal & Moodi Saham Alsubeie & Yaser Hafez & Amero Emeran & Farahat Moghanm & Salah Okasha & Reda Omara & Mohammed A. Basahi & Doaa Bahaa Eldin Darwish & Mohamed F. M. Ibrahim & Ahmed Abou E, 2022. "Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Vegetable and Field Crops under Drought, Salinity and Weeds Stresses: Control Strategies and Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11282-:d:655012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.