IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9982-d630181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keyline in Bean Crop ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for Soil and Water Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Ma. del Carmen Ponce-Rodríguez

    (Programa Institucional de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Constitución 404 sur Zona Centro, Durango 34000, Mexico)

  • Francisco Oscar Carrete-Carreón

    (Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Carretera Durango-Mezquital, km 11.5, Durango 34307, Mexico)

  • Gerardo Alonso Núñez-Fernández

    (Maestría en Geomática Aplicada a Recursos Forestales y Ambientales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Constitución 404 sur Zona Centro, Durango 34000, Mexico)

  • José de Jesús Muñoz-Ramos

    (TecNM, Campus Valle del Guadiana, Carretera Durango-Mexico, km 22.5 s/n, Durango 34371, Mexico)

  • María-Elena Pérez-López

    (Instituto Politécnico Nacional-Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional Durango, Sigma 119, Fraccionamiento 20 de Noviembre II, Durango 34220, Mexico)

Abstract

Soil erosion is a common problem worldwide, and in Durango, Mexico, it occurs in 77.4% of territory. Faced with this problem, the hydrological keyline design (HKD) is an alternative that helps to retain soil, increase infiltration, and keep the water uniformly in the land in order to recover its fertility. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of HKD on moisture and soil conservation in a rainfed agricultural plot during the spring–summer 2018 cycle with a bean crop ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the state of Durango, Mexico. Two treatments were established: control and HKD. The variables to measure the effect of the treatments were: soil water content, water erosion, bean yield, and yield components. The results indicated differences ( p < 0.05) between treatments for the moisture and erosion variables; the HKD retained more water than the control by five percent, while sediment transport was lower in the HKD. No differences ( p > 0.05) were found regarding bean yield and yield components. However, the yield was 126% higher than regional average in terms of rainfed bean production. Therefore, the implementation of the HKD had a positive impact by retaining soil and moisture.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma. del Carmen Ponce-Rodríguez & Francisco Oscar Carrete-Carreón & Gerardo Alonso Núñez-Fernández & José de Jesús Muñoz-Ramos & María-Elena Pérez-López, 2021. "Keyline in Bean Crop ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for Soil and Water Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9982-:d:630181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9982/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9982/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma. del Carmen Ponce-Rodríguez & José Ángel Prieto-Ruíz & Francisco Oscar Carrete-Carreón & María Elena Pérez-López & José de Jesús Muñoz-Ramos & Osvaldo Reyes-Estrada & Héctor Ramírez-Garduño, 2019. "Influence of Stone Bunds on Vegetation and Soil in an Area Reforested with Pinus engelmannii Carr. in the Forests of Durango, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Anil Khokhar & Abrar Yousuf & Manmohanjit Singh & Vivek Sharma & Parminder Singh Sandhu & Gajjala Ravindra Chary, 2021. "Impact of Land Configuration and Strip-Intercropping on Runoff, Soil Loss and Crop Yields under Rainfed Conditions in the Shivalik Foothills of North-West, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Drake N. Mubiru & Jalia Namakula & James Lwasa & Godfrey A. Otim & Joselyn Kashagama & Milly Nakafeero & William Nanyeenya & Mark S. Coyne, 2017. "Conservation Farming and Changing Climate: More Beneficial than Conventional Methods for Degraded Ugandan Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orduño, Miguel Angel & Kallas, Zein & Ornelas, Selene Ivette, 2021. "Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Actions Based on Farmers' Environmental Preferences and Perceptions. Sustainable Agriculture, Mexico," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314967, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Sara Helen Kaweesa & Hamid El Bilali & Willibald Loiskandl, 2021. "Analysing the socio-technical transition to conservation agriculture in Uganda through the lens of the multi-level perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7606-7626, May.
    3. Sara Kaweesa & Saidi Mkomwa & Willibald Loiskandl, 2018. "Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Uganda: A Case Study of the Lango Subregion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Chenhui Li & Wenhai Shi & Mingbin Huang, 2023. "Effects of Crop Rotation and Topography on Soil Erosion and Nutrient Loss under Natural Rainfall Conditions on the Chinese Loess Plateau," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Orduño Torres, Miguel Angel & Kallas, Zein & Ornelas Herrera, Selene Ivette, 2020. "Farmers’ environmental perceptions and preferences regarding climate change adaptation and mitigation actions; towards a sustainable agricultural system in México," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    erosion; moisture; water; soil; yield;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9982-:d:630181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.