IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9965-d629754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 4.0 Industry Technologies and Their Impact in the Continuous Improvement and the Organizational Results: An Empirical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Hugo Arredondo-Méndez

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, European University Miguel de Cervantes (UEMC), 47012 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Lorena Para-González

    (Department of Business Management and Finance, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Carlos Mascaraque-Ramírez

    (Naval Architecture Technology Department, Technical University of Cartagena, 30205 Cartagena, Spain)

  • Manuel Domínguez

    (Design Engineering Area, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28015 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This study analyses the relationships between the technologies of Industry 4.0, continuous improvement, and the business results. To carry out this study, 109 questionnaires to companies of different sectors were collected, but an indispensable condition to take into account was the fact that these companies develop themselves their logistics management. The analysis of the results obtained through the Partial Least Squares (PLS) methodology argues that there is a positive relationship between 4.0 Industry and continuous improvement processes, as well as between continuous improvement processes and organizational results, although it cannot be concluded that a direct relationship between 4.0 Industry and organizational results exists, which means that there are other variables, such as continuous improvement, mediating between them. With this work, there is already an accredited reference of the relationship, which has been verified to exist, between the Industry 4.0, the continuous improvement, and the business results.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Hugo Arredondo-Méndez & Lorena Para-González & Carlos Mascaraque-Ramírez & Manuel Domínguez, 2021. "The 4.0 Industry Technologies and Their Impact in the Continuous Improvement and the Organizational Results: An Empirical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9965-:d:629754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yousef A. M. Qasem & Rusli Abdullah & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Rodziah Atan & Shahla Asadi, 2021. "Analyzing Continuance of Cloud Computing in Higher Education Institutions: Should We Stay, or Should We Go?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-37, April.
    2. Lara Waltersmann & Steffen Kiemel & Julian Stuhlsatz & Alexander Sauer & Robert Miehe, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence Applications for Increasing Resource Efficiency in Manufacturing Companies—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Krummeck & Yagmur Damla Dokur & Daniel Braun & Steffen Kiemel & Robert Miehe, 2022. "Designing Component Interfaces for the Circular Economy—A Case Study for Product-As-A-Service Business Models in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yousra El kihel & Ali El kihel & El Mahdi Bouyahrouzi, 2022. "Contribution of Maintenance 4.0 in Sustainable Development with an Industrial Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Steffen Kiemel & Chantal Rietdorf & Maximilian Schutzbach & Robert Miehe, 2022. "How to Simplify Life Cycle Assessment for Industrial Applications—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Sharma, Mahak & Singh, Anupama & Daim, Tugrul, 2023. "Exploring cloud computing adoption: COVID era in academic institutions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Robert Miehe & Matthias Finkbeiner & Alexander Sauer & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2022. "A System Thinking Normative Approach towards Integrating the Environment into Value-Added Accounting—Paving the Way from Carbon to Environmental Neutrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Abou-Foul, Mohamad & Ruiz-Alba, Jose L. & López-Tenorio, Pablo J., 2023. "The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. João M. R. C. Fernandes & Seyed Mahdi Homayouni & Dalila B. M. M. Fontes, 2022. "Energy-Efficient Scheduling in Job Shop Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, May.
    8. Cevik, Nuket Kırcı & Cevik, Emrah I. & Destek, Mehmet Akif & Bugan, Mehmet Fatih & Manga, Müge, 2024. "Unleashing power of financial technologies on mineral productivity in G-20 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Robert Miehe & Lorena Buckreus & Steffen Kiemel & Alexander Sauer & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for Biointelligent Production—Calling for Systemic Life Cycle Thinking in Cellular Units," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Li, Juan & Ma, Shaoqi & Qu, Yi & Wang, Jiamin, 2023. "The impact of artificial intelligence on firms’ energy and resource efficiency: Empirical evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Xiaozhong Li & Jun Ling, 2023. "The Impact of Manufacturing Intelligence on Green Development Efficiency: A Study Based on Chinese Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Wang, Jianda & Wang, Kun & Dong, Kangyin & Zhang, Shiqiu, 2023. "Assessing the role of financial development in natural resource utilization efficiency: Does artificial intelligence technology matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9965-:d:629754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.