IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9492-d620403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Pre-Verified EPD Tool with Process Simulation Capabilities for the Aggregates Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiota Papadopoulou

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Diego Peñaloza

    (Peab Anläggning AB, 269 73 Förslöv, Sweden
    IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Gauti Asbjörnsson

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Erik Hulthén

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Magnus Evertsson

    (Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

This paper has two aims: to describe the current status and challenges of aggregates producers regarding the analysis and communication of environmental information of their products and to present a layout of a pre-verified tool with simulation capabilities that could assist aggregates producers with their environmental goals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three Swedish aggregates producers, an aggregates customer, and an expert agency. Additionally, published Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for aggregates and the EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019 were studied to reveal current practices and upcoming changes due to the updated standard. The synergies with process simulations were explored as a step towards using the EPD framework for continuous improvement of aggregates production. The interviews indicated that the main challenge for aggregates producers is the lack of easily available plant data for environmental calculations and clearly defined environmental goals at each plant. The proposed tool uses a common process flowsheet for both EPDs and simulations and has a pre-defined LCA module. The use of such a tool is expected to raise the environmental interest at aggregates plants and improve collaboration with LCA experts. Since the analysis is based on the Swedish aggregates market, the interview results are not directly generalizable to the European context.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiota Papadopoulou & Diego Peñaloza & Gauti Asbjörnsson & Erik Hulthén & Magnus Evertsson, 2021. "Development of a Pre-Verified EPD Tool with Process Simulation Capabilities for the Aggregates Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9492-:d:620403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Wall, 2021. "CE Marking of Construction Products—Evolution of the European Approach to Harmonisation of Construction Products in the Light of Environmental Sustainability Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacek Michalak, 2021. "External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS) from Industry and Academia Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacek Michalak & Bartosz Michałowski, 2022. "Understanding Sustainability of Construction Products: Answers from Investors, Contractors, and Sellers of Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Jacek Michalak, 2021. "External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems (ETICS) from Industry and Academia Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9492-:d:620403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.