IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8792-d609510.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future of Insecticide Seed Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Milorad Vojvodić

    (Department of Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetosimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Renata Bažok

    (Department of Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetosimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Seed treatment as a method of local application of pesticides in precise agriculture reduces the amount of pesticides used per unit area and is considered to be the safest, cheapest and most ecologically acceptable method of protecting seeds and young plants from pests in the early stages of their development. With the introduction of insecticides from the neonicotinoid group in the mid-1990s, the frequency of seed treatment increased. Due to suspected negative effects on pollinators, most of these insecticides are banned in the European Union. The ban has therefore led to a reduction in the number of active substances approved for seed treatment and to an increased re-use of active substances from the group of pyrethroids as well as other organophosphorus insecticides, which pose potentially very serious risks, perhaps even greater than those of the banned neonicotinoids. The objective of this review is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of seed treatment and the potential role of insecticide seed treatment in reducing the negative impact of pesticides on the environment. The main disadvantage of this method is that it has been widely accepted and has become a prophylactic protective measure applied to almost all fields. This is contrary to the principles of integrated pest management and leads to an increased input of insecticides into the environment, by treating a larger number of hectares with a lower amount of active ingredient, and a negative impact on beneficial entomofauna. In addition, studies show that due to the prophylactic approach, the economic and technical justification of this method is often questionable. Extremely important for a quality implementation are the correct processing and implementation of the treatment procedure as well as the selection of appropriate insecticides, which have proven to be problematic in the case of neonicotinoids. The ban on neonicotinoids and the withdrawal of seed treatments in oilseed rape and sugar beet has led to increased problems with a range of pests affecting these crops at an early stage of growth. The results of the present studies indicate good efficacy of active ingredients belonging to the group of anthranilic diamides, cyantraniliprole and chlorantraniliprole in the treatment of maize, soybean, sugar beet and rice seeds on pests of the above-ground part of the plant, but not on wireworms. Good efficacy in controlling wireworms in maize is shown by an insecticide in the naturalites group, spinosad, but it is currently used to treat seeds of vegetable crops, mainly onions, to control onion flies and flies on other vegetable crops. Seed treatment as a method only fits in with the principles of integrated pest management when treated seeds are sown on land where there is a positive prognosis for pest infestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Milorad Vojvodić & Renata Bažok, 2021. "Future of Insecticide Seed Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8792-:d:609510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haruhiko Siomi & Mikiko C. Siomi, 2009. "On the road to reading the RNA-interference code," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7228), pages 396-404, January.
    2. Helena Viric Gasparic & Mirela Grubelic & Verica Dragovic Uzelac & Renata Bazok & Maja Cacija & Zrinka Drmic & Darija Lemic, 2020. "Neonicotinoid Residues in Sugar Beet Plants and Soil under Different Agro-Climatic Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darija Lemic & Mario Schumann & Ralf Tilcher & Olaf Czarnecki & Katarina M. Mikac & Domagoj Vučemilović-Jurić & Helena Viric Gasparic, 2024. "Enhancing pest management in sugar beet cultivation: impact of variety selection and insecticide seed treatments on sugar beet flea beetles and weevils," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(3), pages 278-287.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roxana Zaharia & Elena Trotuș & Georgeta Trașcă & Emil Georgescu & Agripina Șapcaliu & Viorel Fătu & Cristina Petrișor & Carmen Mincea, 2023. "Impact of Seed Treatment with Imidacloprid, Clothianidin and Thiamethoxam on Soil, Plants, Bees and Hive Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Renata Bažok, 2022. "Integrated Pest Management of Field Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-5, March.
    3. Ivana Varga & Zdenko Lončarić & Suzana Kristek & Antonela Markulj Kulundžić & Andrijana Rebekić & Manda Antunović, 2021. "Sugar Beet Root Yield and Quality with Leaf Seasonal Dynamics in Relation to Planting Densities and Nitrogen Fertilization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8792-:d:609510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.