IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p7743-d592439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering a Sustainable City Using Self-Assessment of Environmental Performance on EcoCitOpia Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Ratchayuda Kongboon

    (Research Unit for Energy, Economic and Ecological Management, Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Shabbir H. Gheewala

    (The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
    Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment, PERDO, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok 10140, Thailand)

  • Sate Sampattagul

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
    Excellence Center in Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

In Thailand, many municipalities lack the information to guide decision-making for improving environmental performance. They need tools to systematize the collection and analysis of data, and then to self-assess environmental performance to increase efficiency in environmental management toward a sustainable city. The aim of this study is to develop a platform for self-assessment of an environmental performance index. Nonthaburi municipality, Hat Yai municipality, and Yasothon municipality were selected to study the work context for six indicators, viz., energy, greenhouse gas, water, air, waste, and green area, which were important environmental problems. The development of an online system called “EcoCitOpia” divides municipality assessment into four parts: data collection, database creation, data analysis, and data display. The municipality can use the system for the assessment of environmental performance and the creation of a separate database based on indicators. The system can analyze the results and display them in the form of radar graphs, line graphs, and tables for use in public communication that will lead to cooperation in solving environmental problems at the policy level for urban development to meet the Sustainable Development Goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratchayuda Kongboon & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Sate Sampattagul, 2021. "Empowering a Sustainable City Using Self-Assessment of Environmental Performance on EcoCitOpia Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7743-:d:592439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7743/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7743/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eglė Klumbytė & Raimondas Bliūdžius & Milena Medineckienė & Paris A. Fokaides, 2021. "An MCDM Model for Sustainable Decision-Making in Municipal Residential Buildings Facilities Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2018. "Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities – An experiment on stockholm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 24-35.
    3. Hafiz Syed Mohsin Abbas & Xiaodong Xu & Chunxia Sun & Atta Ullah & Ghulam Nabi & Samreen Gillani & Muhammad Ahsan Ali Raza, 2021. "Sustainable Use of Energy Resources, Regulatory Quality, and Foreign Direct Investment in Controlling GHGs Emissions among Selected Asian Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Steve Harris & Jan Weinzettel & Gregor Levin, 2020. "Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Komninos Angelakoglou & Georgios Gaidajis, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Evaluate the Environmental Sustainability Performance of Mining Industrial Facilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Javier Rodrigo-Ilarri & Claudia P. Romero & María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero, 2020. "Land Use/Land Cover Assessment over Time Using a New Weighted Environmental Index (WEI) Based on an Object-Oriented Model and GIS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Fuzhong Chen & Guohai Jiang & Kangyin Dong, 2022. "How do FDI inflows curvilinearly affect carbon emissions? Threshold effects of energy service availability and cleanliness," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 798-824, December.
    3. Duggal, Angel Swastik & Singh, Rajesh & Gehlot, Anita & Gupta, Lovi Raj & Akram, Sheik Vaseem & Prakash, Chander & Singh, Sunpreet & Kumar, Raman, 2021. "Infrastructure, mobility and safety 4.0: Modernization in road transportation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Paraskevi Ovezikoglou & Dimitrios Aidonis & Charisios Achillas & Christos Vlachokostas & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Investments Based on a Multiple Criteria Methodological Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Olszewski, Robert & Wendland, Agnieszka, 2021. "Digital Agora – Knowledge acquisition from spatial databases, geoinformation society VGI and social media data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Fang‐Li Ruan & Liang Yan, 2022. "Challenges facing indicators to become a universal language for sustainable urban development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 41-57, February.
    7. Annette Hafner & Simon Slabik & Michael Storck, 2020. "Urban Site Development as Temporal Carbon Storage—A Case Study in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Karima Kourtit & Bart Neuts & Peter Nijkamp & Marie H. Wahlström, 2021. "A Structural Equation Model for Place-based City Love: An Application to Swedish Cities," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 44(3-4), pages 432-465, May.
    9. Konstantinos Kourtzanidis & Komninos Angelakoglou & Vasilis Apostolopoulos & Paraskevi Giourka & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, 2021. "Assessing Impact, Performance and Sustainability Potential of Smart City Projects: Towards a Case Agnostic Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-38, July.
    10. Cristina ALPOPI & Stefan Gabriel BURCEA & Ruxandra Irina POPESCU & Sorin BURLACU, 2022. "Evaluation Of Romania'S Progress In Achieving Sdg 11: Sustainable Cities And Communities," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(2), pages 76-87, August.
    11. Ullah, Atta & Pinglu, Chen & Ullah, Saif & Qaisar, Zahid Hussain & Qian, Ningyu, 2022. "The dynamic nexus of E-Government, and sustainable development: Moderating role of multi-dimensional regional integration index in Belt and Road partner countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Changfeng Jing & Mingyi Du & Songnian Li & Siyuan Liu, 2019. "Geospatial Dashboards for Monitoring Smart City Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Muhammad Ahsan Ali Raza & Chen Yan & Hafiz Syed Mohsin Abbas & Sara Ilahi, 2024. "Do Remittance Inflows, Investment Attributes, and Regional Integration Accelerate Sustainable Economic Growth in Asia?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1302-1317, March.
    14. Xindi Xu & Xinjun Wang, 2021. "The Spatial Correlation between Foreign Direct Investment and Air Quality in China and the Potential Channel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Despoina Aktsoglou & Georgios Gaidajis, 2020. "A Case Study on Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Spatial Entities with Anthropogenic Activities: The National Park of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Xia Li & Songtao Cheng & Yigui Wang & Guozhuang Zhang & Leyi Zhang & Chen Wu, 2023. "Future Land Use Spatial Conflicts and Habitat Quality Impacts Based on SSPs-RCPs Scenarios—Qin-Ba Mountain City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Pierfrancesco De Paola & Francesco Tajani & Marco Locurcio, 2021. "Sustainable Real Estate: Management, Assessment and Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-6, April.
    18. Nuno Marques da Costa & Nelson Mileu & André Alves, 2021. "Dashboard COMPRIME_COMPRI_MOv: Multiscalar Spatio-Temporal Monitoring of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Hou Renyong & Aman Ali Sedik, 2023. "Environmental Sustainability and Foreign Direct Investment in East Africa: Institutional and Policy Benefits for Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    20. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter & Türk, Umut & Wahlstrom, Mia, 2022. "City love and place quality assessment of liveable and loveable neighbourhoods in Rotterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:7743-:d:592439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.