IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6961-d578903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Survey of Environmental Content in United States Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Curricula

Author

Listed:
  • Charles E. Sprouse III

    (School of Engineering, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS 66002, USA)

  • Maximilian Davy

    (School of Engineering, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS 66002, USA)

  • Anna Doyle

    (School of Engineering, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS 66002, USA)

  • Grace Rembold

    (School of Engineering, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS 66002, USA)

Abstract

This survey examines how mechanical engineers are being prepared to be responsible stewards of the environment by offering a multi-channeled look at a diverse collection of twelve US colleges and universities, with connections to the larger global context. This study enumerates the external influences of professional organizations, those responsible for program accreditation (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)), professional conduct (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), and licensure (National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, National Society of Professional Engineers). At the curricular level, this study presents current mechanical engineering curricula via core courses (required at most institutions) and non-core courses (required at a minority of institutions or elective courses). The curriculum study identifies fifteen core courses and uses the Open Syllabus Project and online bookstores to identify a representative textbook and classify the environmental content therein. Immediate results show the environment receiving sparse treatment in core course textbooks, institutions having zero environment-focused degree requirements, and a tendency towards offering electives that are narrowly focused on green technologies. Elective offerings mirror ABET’s recent move away from emphasizing the “broad education necessary to understand the impact” of engineering solutions to instead “consider the impact of” engineering solutions in an environmental context. Overall, the environmental education mechanical engineers are receiving is insufficient in amount and lacking in scientific and ethical foundation. Ideally, every mechanical engineering program should include coordinated environmental content throughout the curriculum and require at least one course that teaches both environmental design principles and the importance of environmental stewardship. A novel approach eschews the typical artes mechanicae course structure to teach environmental stewardship in the artes liberales educational tradition, emphasizing multi-dimensional thinking by employing great books style discussions of seminal scientific, ethical, and technological works.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles E. Sprouse III & Maximilian Davy & Anna Doyle & Grace Rembold, 2021. "A Critical Survey of Environmental Content in United States Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6961-:d:578903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6961/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6961/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrycja Hąbek & Magdalena Palacz & Fizza Saeed, 2024. "Embedding Sustainability into Mechanical Engineering Master Programs—A Case Study of the Top Technical Universities in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Joan K. Tisdale & Angela R. Bielefeldt, 2024. "Exploring Sustainability Instruction Methods in Engineering Thermodynamics Courses: Insights from Scholarship of Teaching and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6961-:d:578903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.