Author
Listed:
- Najib Rahman Sabory
(Department of Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul 1004, Afghanistan
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan)
- Tomonobo Senjyu
(Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan)
- Adina Hashemi Momand
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul 1004, Afghanistan)
- Hadya Waqfi
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul 1004, Afghanistan)
- Nilofar Saboor
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul 1004, Afghanistan)
- Rabia Mobarez
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul 1004, Afghanistan)
- Farida Razeqi
(Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Kabul University, Kabul 1004, Afghanistan)
Abstract
Urbanization and technology have proven to be detrimental to the environment. Buildings contribute a significant portion of this damage. This issue motivated governments, builders, engineers, and architects to seek ways to reduce buildings’ environmental footprints. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), is one of the most widely used strategies to ensure energy efficiency and a clean environment in buildings. In Afghanistan, where there are no active regulatory frameworks for energy saving and efficiency for the building sector, it is imperative to promote the transformation of the building industry and practices towards sustainability. In this regard, the role of the residential building sector is of utmost importance due to its major share in the country’s energy consumption and GHG emissions profile. Thus, this study assesses the energy efficiency and environmental impact of existing buildings in Kabul city concerning the LEED rating system. This research suggests practical steps to improve the sustainability of the residential building stock in Kabul city. Robust sets of data on existing residential buildings in Kabul are collected, classified, evaluated, and compared to LEED standards. This research reveals and concludes that most of the existing buildings in Kabul city are in poor conditions and do not meet the minimum requirements to be a candidate for LEED certification. A detailed analysis of the results has led to recommendations on how these buildings could improve to meet the LEED criteria. This is the first study of its kind conducted for Kabul city residential building. Considering the cross-sectoral nature of the building industry, the findings of this study will contribute to many other areas such as water, transportation, ICT, health, energy and the environment.
Suggested Citation
Najib Rahman Sabory & Tomonobo Senjyu & Adina Hashemi Momand & Hadya Waqfi & Nilofar Saboor & Rabia Mobarez & Farida Razeqi, 2021.
"LEED Scores of Residential Buildings in Poor Cities: Kabul City Case,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6959-:d:578844
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Mir Sayed Shah Danish, 2023.
"AI and Expert Insights for Sustainable Energy Future,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, April.
- Irshad, Ahmad Shah & Samadi, Wais Khan & Fazli, Agha Mohammad & Noori, Abdul Ghani & Amin, Ahmad Shah & Zakir, Mohammad Naseer & Bakhtyal, Irfan Ahmad & Karimi, Bashir Ahmad & Ludin, Gul Ahmad & Senjy, 2023.
"Resilience and reliable integration of PV-wind and hydropower based 100% hybrid renewable energy system without any energy storage system for inaccessible area electrification,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
- Minerva Bonilla & William Rasdorf, 2023.
"Identification of Construction Inhibitors and Sustainable Construction Practices for Alternative Intersections and Interchanges,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6959-:d:578844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.