IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6914-d577672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Water Footprint of Primary and Secondary Processing of Beef from Different Cattle Breeds: A Value Fraction Allocation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Frikkie Alberts Maré

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa)

  • Henry Jordaan

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa)

Abstract

The high water intake and wastewater discharge of slaughterhouses have been a concern for many years. One neglected factor in previous research is allocating the water footprint (WF) to beef production’s different products and by-products. The objective of this article was to estimate the WF of different cattle breeds at a slaughterhouse and cutting plant and allocate it according to the different cuts (products) and by-products of beef based on the value fraction of each. The results indicated a negative relationship between the carcass weight and the processing WF when the different breeds were compared. Regarding a specific cut of beef, a kilogram of rib eye from the heaviest breed had a processing WF of 614.57 L/kg, compared to the 919.91 L/kg for the rib eye of the lightest breed. A comparison of the different cuts indicated that high-value cuts had higher WFs than low-value cuts. The difference between a kilogram of rib eye and flank was 426.26 L/kg for the heaviest breed and 637.86 L/kg for the lightest breed. An option to reduce the processing WF of beef is to lessen the WF by slaughtering heavier animals. This will require no extra investment from the slaughterhouse. At the same time, the returns should increase as the average production inputs per kilogram of output (carcass) should reduce, as the slaughterhouse will process more kilograms.

Suggested Citation

  • Frikkie Alberts Maré & Henry Jordaan, 2021. "The Water Footprint of Primary and Secondary Processing of Beef from Different Cattle Breeds: A Value Fraction Allocation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6914-:d:577672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Ali Musa & Syazwani Idrus, 2021. "Physical and Biological Treatment Technologies of Slaughterhouse Wastewater: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Ayanda M. Ngxumeshe & Motshekwe Ratsaka & Bohani Mtileni & Khathutshelo Nephawe, 2020. "Sustainable Application of Livestock Water Footprints in Different Beef Production Systems of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. P. L. Oosthuizen & F. A. Maré, 2018. "The profit-maximising feeding period for different breeds of beef cattle," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 108-120, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yasmin Saif & Mahwish Ali & Ian M. Jones & Safia Ahmed, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of a Field-Scale Anaerobic Baffled Reactor as an Economic and Sustainable Solution for Domestic Wastewater Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Maré, F.A. & Jordaan, H., 2019. "Pr - The Economic Feed Consumption Of Different Cattle Breeds In A Cow-Calf Production System," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345883, International Farm Management Association.
    3. Ankita Bhowmik & Shantanu Bhunia & Anupam Debsarkar & Rambilash Mallick & Malancha Roy & Joydeep Mukherjee, 2021. "Development of a Novel Helical-Ribbon Mixer Dryer for Conversion of Rural Slaughterhouse Wastes to an Organic Fertilizer and Implications in the Rural Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Edris Bazrafshan & Hamid Reza Zakeri & Melissa Gurgel Adeodato Vieira & Zahra Derakhshan & Leili Mohammadi & Amin Mohammadpour & Amin Mousavi Khaneghah, 2022. "Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment by Integrated Chemical Coagulation and Electro-Fenton Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Maria Cristina Collivignarelli & Alessandro Abbà & Francesca Maria Caccamo & Silvia Calatroni & Vincenzo Torretta & Ioannis A. Katsoyiannis & Marco Carnevale Miino & Elena Cristina Rada, 2021. "Applications of Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) and Characteristics of Its Microbial Community: A Review of Bibliometric Trend and Recent Findings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6914-:d:577672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.