Author
Listed:
- Pilar Legua
(Plant Production and Microbiology Department, Polytechnic School of Orihuela (EPSO), Miguel Hernandez University, Ctra. Beniel Km 3.2, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain)
- Francisca Hernández
(Plant Production and Microbiology Department, Polytechnic School of Orihuela (EPSO), Miguel Hernandez University, Ctra. Beniel Km 3.2, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain)
- Francesca Tozzi
(Department of Horticulture, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy)
- Rafael Martínez-Font
(Plant Production and Microbiology Department, Polytechnic School of Orihuela (EPSO), Miguel Hernandez University, Ctra. Beniel Km 3.2, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain)
- David Jorquera
(Think Tank InnoTech, Scientific Park of Murcia, Carretera de Madrid Km 388, 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain)
- Caridad Rosique Jiménez
(Electromagnetism and Electronics Department, Agroforestry Engineering Area, Campus de Espinardo, University of Murcia, 30100 Espinardo, Murcia, Spain)
- Edgardo Giordani
(Department of Horticulture, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy)
- Juan José Martínez-Nicolás
(Plant Production and Microbiology Department, Polytechnic School of Orihuela (EPSO), Miguel Hernandez University, Ctra. Beniel Km 3.2, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain)
- Pablo Melgarejo
(Plant Production and Microbiology Department, Polytechnic School of Orihuela (EPSO), Miguel Hernandez University, Ctra. Beniel Km 3.2, 03312 Orihuela, Alicante, Spain)
Abstract
The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was applied to identify the potential environmental impact of dredged sediments used as growing media for food crops. The dredged sediments used came from Livorno port and were previously phytoremediated. For the assay, strawberry plants ( Fragaria x ananassa Duch vr. ‘San Andreas’) were used. The plants were cultivated on three different substrates (100% peat, 100% dredged sediment and 50% mix peat/sediment) to identify the real impact of the culture media on the growing process. LCA was calculated and analyzed according to ISO 14040:2006 by SimaPro software. ReCipe Midpoint (E) V1.13/Europe Recipe E method was applied. One kilogram of produced strawberry, for each crop media tested, was defined as the functional unit. Eighteen impact categories were selected where Marine Eutrophication (ME), Human Toxicity (HT) and Freshwater Ecotoxicity (FET) were identified as relevant impact categories. The LCA results showed an increase in the environmental impact of strawberry cultivation using 100% sediment against 100% peat, due to the decrease in fruit production caused by the sediment. Nevertheless, the decrease in the environmental impact and the fruit production increase identified when the sediment is used mixed (<50%) with other substrates. The appropriate use of these substrates would be justified within the context of the circular economy.
Suggested Citation
Pilar Legua & Francisca Hernández & Francesca Tozzi & Rafael Martínez-Font & David Jorquera & Caridad Rosique Jiménez & Edgardo Giordani & Juan José Martínez-Nicolás & Pablo Melgarejo, 2021.
"Application of LCA Methodology to the Production of Strawberry on Substrates with Peat and Sediments from Ports,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6323-:d:567789
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Hessampour, Reza & Bastani, Aboubakr & Hassani, Mehrdad & Failla, Sabina & Vaverková, Magdalena Daria & Halog, Anthony, 2023.
"Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for the benchmarking of energy, exergy, environmental effects, and water footprint in the canned apple supply chain,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
- Laura Ferrans & Alexander Nilsson & Frank Schmieder & Divya Pal & Mahboubeh Rahmati-Abkenar & Marcia Marques & William Hogland, 2022.
"Life Cycle Assessment of Management Scenarios for Dredged Sediments: Environmental Impacts Caused during Landfilling and Soil Conditioning,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6323-:d:567789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.