IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6306-d567666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evidence Review of Ageing, Long-Term Care Provision and Funding Mechanisms in Turkey: Using Existing Evidence to Estimate Long-Term Care Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ismail

    (Oxford Institute for Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PR, UK
    Analytical Research Ltd., Surrey GU24 0ER, UK)

  • Shereen Hussein

    (Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK)

Abstract

Turkey is transitioning from an ageing to aged population at a fast pace. This process requires immediate policy and practice planning and actionable strategies. Formulating and implementing such policies needs to acknowledge parallel demographic and socio-economic changes to ensure adequate resources and appropriate services are developed to enhance the growing older population’s quality of life and wellbeing. Limited long-term care (LTC) provision, funding mechanisms and reliance on informal support primarily provided by women pose considerable challenges to all stakeholders, including the state, families and older people. This paper provides an evidence review on older people's status and their health and care needs, current LTC policies, provision and funding mechanisms in Turkey. It employs a mixed review methodology, making use of published statistics, indicators and literature. The study also adapts existing LTC funding estimation models to predict LTC cost for Turkey. The review highlights the increasing share of older people in Turkey, the fast pace of population ageing, and escalating health and LTC unmet needs. Older people are reported to have high levels of depression, loneliness and co-morbidity with regional, gender and educational differentials. The Turkish LTC and welfare models rely on the family, particularly women, in meeting increased demand. A hierarchical model with random intercept was implemented and estimated the LTC cost in Turkey to be 0.02% of GDP, acknowledging the high proportion of people at labour participation age range and low female employment levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ismail & Shereen Hussein, 2021. "An Evidence Review of Ageing, Long-Term Care Provision and Funding Mechanisms in Turkey: Using Existing Evidence to Estimate Long-Term Care Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6306-:d:567666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan COSTA‐FONT & Christophe Courbage & Katherine Swartz, 2015. "Financing Long‐Term Care: Ex Ante, Ex Post or Both?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 45-57, March.
    2. Yardim, Mahmut S. & Uner, Sarp, 2018. "Equity in access to care in the era of health system reforms in Turkey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 645-651.
    3. Kim, Kijong & İlkkaracan, İpek & Kaya, Tolga, 2019. "Public investment in care services in Turkey: Promoting employment & gender inclusive growth," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1210-1229.
    4. Christine de la Maisonneuve & Joaquim Oliveira Martins, 2013. "Public Spending on Health and Long-term Care: A new set of projections," OECD Economic Policy Papers 6, OECD Publishing.
    5. Joan COSTA‐FONT & Christophe Courbage & Katherine Swartz, 2015. "Financing Long‐Term Care: Ex Ante, Ex Post or Both?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 45-57, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guangbo Ma & Kun Xu, 2022. "Value-Based Health Care: Long-Term Care Insurance for Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenses and Self-Rated Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Longobardo, Luz María Peña & Rodríguez-Sánchez, Beatriz & Oliva, Juan, 2023. "Does becoming an informal caregiver make your health worse? A longitudinal analysis across Europe," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    3. Ozbugday, Fatih Cemil & Tirgil, Abdullah & Kose, Elif Gul, 2020. "Efficiency changes in long-term care in OECD countries: A non-parametric Malmquist Index approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. -, 2022. "Financing care systems and policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Contributions for a sustainable recovery with gender equality," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 48382 edited by Eclac.
    5. Matus-López, Mauricio, 2020. "Un sistema de atención a la dependencia para Chile. Apuntes desde la experiencia española [A long-term care system for Chile. Lessons from the experience of Spain]," MPRA Paper 105709, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Bonsang, Eric & Costa-Font, Joan, 2020. "Behavioral regularities in old age planning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 297-300.
    7. Rapp, Thomas & Jena, Anupam B. & Costa-Font, Joan & Grabowski, David C., 2023. "Caregiving across generations: Do older adults with more grandchildren get another bite at the “sandwich” generation?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    8. He, Alex Jingwei & Qian, Jiwei & Chan, Wai-sum & Chou, Kee-lee, 2021. "Preferences for private long-term care insurance products in a super-ageing society: A discrete choice experiment in Hong Kong," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Lana Kordic & Josipa Visic, 2023. "Total Factor Productivity Change Of Long-Term Care System In Selected Oecd Countries," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 32(1), pages 3-18, june.
    10. Claudine de Meijer & Pieter Bakx & Eddy van Doorslaer & Marc Koopmanschap, 2015. "Explaining Declining Rates of Institutional LTC Use in the Netherlands: A Decomposition Approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 18-31, March.
    11. Joan Costa‐Font & Christophe Courbage, 2015. "Crowding Out of Long‐Term Care Insurance: Evidence from European Expectations Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 74-88, March.
    12. de Bresser, Jochem & Knoef, Marike & van Ooijen, Raun, 2022. "Preferences for in-kind and in-cash home care insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Randall S. Jones & Haruki Seitani, 2019. "Meeting fiscal challenges in Japan’s rapidly ageing society," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1569, OECD Publishing.
    14. Armel Ngami & Thomas Seegmuller, 2021. "Pollution and growth: The role of pension in the efficiency of health and environmental policies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 17(4), pages 390-415, December.
    15. Korfhage, Thorben & Fischer-Weckemann, Björn, 2024. "Long-run consequences of informal elderly care and implications of public long-term care insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s2:p:38-45 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Costa-Font, Joan & Jiménez-Martín, Sergi & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2022. "Do Public Caregiving Subsidies and Supports affect the Provision of Care and Transfers?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Philippe De Donder & Marie-Louise Leroux, 2015. "The Political Economy of (in)formal Long Term Care Transfers," Cahiers de recherche 1508, Chaire de recherche Industrielle Alliance sur les enjeux économiques des changements démographiques.
    19. Songul Cinaroglu, 2020. "Modelling unbalanced catastrophic health expenditure data by using machine‐learning methods," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 168-181, October.
    20. William Lim & Gaurav Khemka & David Pitt & Bridget Browne, 2019. "A method for calculating the implied no-recovery three-state transition matrix using observable population mortality incidence and disability prevalence rates among the elderly," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 245-282, September.
    21. Ayşenur Demir & Ömer Alkan & Abdulbaki Bilgiç & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Abdulkerim Karaaslan, 2022. "Determinants of Turkish households' out‐of‐pocket expenditures on three categories of health care services: A multivariate probit approach," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 2303-2327, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6306-:d:567666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.