IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5968-d562115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Descriptive Analytical Study on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Sustainable Aging

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Andrade Figueira

    (PosGraduation Program of Nursing and BioSciences—PpgEnfBio—Alfredo Pinto Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 22180-290, Brazil)

  • Olivia Andrade Figueira

    (Life Science School, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana (PUR-PR), Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil)

  • Carla Corradi-Perini

    (Life Science School, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana (PUR-PR), Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil)

  • Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez

    (Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Alicante (UA), 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Alan Andrade Figueira

    (Life Science School, Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana (PUR-PR), Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil)

  • Carlos Roberto Lyra da Silva

    (PosGraduation Program of Nursing and BioSciences—PpgEnfBio—Alfredo Pinto Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 22180-290, Brazil)

  • Estelio Henrique Martin Dantas

    (PosGraduation Program of Nursing and BioSciences—PpgEnfBio—Alfredo Pinto Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro State Federal University (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 22180-290, Brazil)

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) improves the quality of life (QOL) of older people, increasing overall health and well-being and enabling them to take control over their own lives, and is highly correlated with sustainable aging. Objective: To relate the practice of PA with QOL for sustainable aging. Method: The sample of this cross-sectional inquiry analytical observational ex post facto research was composed of 690 community-dwelling older people of both genders, non-selected volunteers, living in Brazil, present at a road run in Rio de Janeiro, from 30 October 2019 to 12 March 2020, that answered an instrument starting with profile questions, followed by selected questions on QOL from world health organization quality of life for old age (WHOQOL-Old) and on PA from Baecke-Old. Results: The mean age bracket was 65–69 years, 73.6% female. This sample was characterized as active (84%), having university level education (75%), fitting the concept of a high level of QOL (73.35 ± 12.6). QOL was distributed as: 562 (81.2%) at 70–100%; 123 (17.9%) at 41–69%; 5 (0.7%) at 32–40%. Between active and sedentary lifestyle and QOL, the sedentary lifestyle presented a lower QOL score while the active QOL score was highest, with a correspondence with p < 0.001, DF = 2, with 99.9% certainty and Pearson’s chi-square test critical value = 19.2. Conclusion: The sample of older people characterized by high QOL and PA with a university level education suggests the triangulation between advanced education, PA and QOL. The QOL of the older people with high scores was associated with the practice of PA, and low scores were associated with a sedentary lifestyle; this conclusion can be applied to sustainable aging of general society.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Andrade Figueira & Olivia Andrade Figueira & Carla Corradi-Perini & Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez & Alan Andrade Figueira & Carlos Roberto Lyra da Silva & Estelio Henrique Martin Dantas, 2021. "A Descriptive Analytical Study on Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Sustainable Aging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5968-:d:562115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benxi Lin & Zongjian Lin & Yu Yvette Zhang & Weiping Liu, 2018. "The Impact of the New Rural Pension Scheme on Retirement Sustainability in China: Evidence of Regional Differences in Formal and Informal Labor Supply," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Xu, Hongwei, 2019. "Physical and mental health of Chinese grandparents caring for grandchildren and great-grandparents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 106-116.
    3. Winters, John V., 2011. "Human capital, higher education institutions, and quality of life," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 446-454, September.
    4. Doris Baumann & Willibald Ruch & Katja Margelisch & Fabian Gander & Lisa Wagner, 2020. "Character Strengths and Life Satisfaction in Later Life: an Analysis of Different Living Conditions," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 329-347, April.
    5. Thorsten Schilling & Romano Wyss & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "The Resilience of Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Lin, B. & Lin, Z. & Zhang, Y.Y. & Liu, W., 2018. "The Impact of New Rural Pension Scheme on the Rural Elderly in China: Evidences of Regional Differences in Formal and Informal Labor Supply," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275997, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phuong Huu Khiem & Yu-Chen Kuo, 2022. "Health insurance reform impact on children’s educational attainment: evidence from Vietnam," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1255-1285, December.
    2. Huan Wang & Jianyuan Huang & Shuangyue Sun, 2019. "Assessment of the Financial Sustainability of China’s New Rural Pension Plan: Does the Demographic Policy Reform Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Lanying Sun & Changhao Su & Xinghui Xian, 2020. "Assessing the Sustainability of China’s Basic Pension Funding for Urban and Rural Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Qiaolong Huang & Yu Yvette Zhang & Qin Chen & Manxiu Ning, 2021. "Does Air Pollution Decrease Labor Supply of the Rural Middle-Aged and Elderly?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Zuojuan Li & Guofeng Li & Ke Zhang & Jingxin Zhu, 2022. "Do Social Pension and Family Support Affect Farmers’ Land Transfer? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Xin Gao & Tieying Feng, 2020. "Public Pension, Labor Force Participation, and Depressive Symptoms across Gender among Older Adults in Rural China: A Moderated Mediation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Benxi Lin & Yu Yvette Zhang, 2019. "The Impact of Fiscal Subsidies on the Sustainability of China’s Rural Pension Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Gregorio Gimenez & Luis Vargas-Montoya, 2021. "ICT Use and Successful Learning: The Role of the Stock of Human Capital," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Guangliang Yang & Lixing Li & Shihe Fu, 2020. "Do rural migrants benefit from labor market agglomeration economies? Evidence from Chinese cities," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 910-931, September.
    10. Yongli Wang & Yiran Zhao & Jinjin Lu & Yuan Gao, 2024. "Young Children’s Digital Literacy Practices with Caregivers in the Home Environment: Voices of Chinese Parents and Grandparents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. John V. Winters, 2020. "In-State College Enrollment and Later Life Location Decisions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(4), pages 1400-1426.
    12. Eugénia de Matos Pedro & João Leitão & Helena Alves, 2021. "HEI Efficiency and Quality of Life: Seeding the Pro-Sustainability Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Wang, Shuhong & Li, Shengxiao (Alex) & Hu, Wanyang, 2022. "Grandparenting and subjective well-being in China: The moderating effects of residential location, gender, age, and income," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    14. Zhou, Qin & Cheng, Changgao & Fang, Zhou & Zhang, Hengquan & Xu, Yining, 2024. "How does the development of the digital economy affect innovation output? Exploring mechanisms from the perspective of regional innovation systems," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-17.
    15. Belal Fallah & Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman, 2014. "Geography and High-Tech Employment Growth in US Counties," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 683-720.
    16. Jacob Hale & Suzanna Long, 2020. "A Time Series Sustainability Assessment of a Partial Energy Portfolio Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Maomao Zhang & Weigang Chen & Kui Cai & Xin Gao & Xuesong Zhang & Jinxiang Liu & Zhiyuan Wang & Deshou Li, 2019. "Analysis of the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Resilience and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of 56 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Dan S. Rickman, 2013. "Should Oklahoma Be More Like Texas? A Taxing Decision," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 43(1), pages 1-22, Summer.
    19. Kanat Abdulla & Balzhan Serikbayeva & Yessengali Oskenbayev & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2022. "Regional Differences in Human Capital and Occupational Choice: Evidence from Mexico," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(6), pages 2899-2922, December.
    20. Adler, Matthew D. & Dolan, Paul & Kavetsos, Georgios, 2017. "Would you choose to be happy? Tradeoffs between happiness and the other dimensions of life in a large population survey," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 60-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5968-:d:562115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.