IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5945-d561656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional Differences Found in the Elderly Living in the Community

Author

Listed:
  • Estela Calatayud

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Institute of Health Research of Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Roca

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Javier Aresté

    (Independent Scholar, 50004 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Yolanda Marcén-Román

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Institute of Health Research of Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Carlos Salavera

    (Faculty of Education, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Isabel Gómez-Soria

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Institute of Health Research of Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Introduction: Successful aging lies in cognitive and functional maintenance, and in the optimal performance of daily tasks that keep the elderly free of disability and dependence. However, there is little evidence for functional differences for gender and age, and how cognitive and physical demands in past working lives can affect them, to design more personalized occupational therapy interventions to prevent functional and cognitive impairment. Method: This observational descriptive study evaluated 367 older adults living in a community with subjective memory complaints and scored between 24 and 35 with the Spanish version of the “Mini-Mental State Examination (MEC-35)”. Basic activities of daily living (BADL) were studied with the Barthel Index, while instrumental ADL (IADL) were examined with the Lawton–Brody scale. Functional differences for gender, age, and physico-mental occupation were examined. Results: The significant differences found for gender indicated that men did better in BADL ( p = 0.026) and women better performed IADL ( p < 0.001). Differences between age groups suggest that the younger group (aged 64–75) obtained better results for BADL ( p = 0.001) and IADL ( p < 0.001). For physico-mental occupation, statistically significant differences were found only in IADL for mental ( p = 0.034) and physical occupation ( p = 0.005). Conclusions: Gender, age, and the cognitive and physical demands of occupational stages, can be important predictors of cognitive and functional impairment. These results can be generalized to other health centers in the province and to other Spanish Autonomous Communities because their socio-demographic variables are similar. It would be interesting to carry out multimodal personalized interventions that consider the factors that might affect functional impairment to preserve personal autonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Estela Calatayud & Beatriz Rodríguez-Roca & Javier Aresté & Yolanda Marcén-Román & Carlos Salavera & Isabel Gómez-Soria, 2021. "Functional Differences Found in the Elderly Living in the Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5945-:d:561656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhengqing Zhang & Chenggang Zhang & Xiaomeng Li, 2022. "The Ethical Governance for the Vulnerability of Care Robots: Interactive-Distance-Oriented Flexible Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Chen Li & Jiaji Wu & Yi Huang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Coupling Characteristics of Rural Elderly Care Institutions in China: Sustainable Human Settlements Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5945-:d:561656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.