IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5560-d555795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of Health and Fitness Information Platform Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Wen Lee

    (College of Modern Management, Yango University, Fuzhou 350015, China)

  • Tzu-Chun Huang

    (Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Wei-Shiang Lai

    (Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Ching Li

    (Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

The roles of content producers, information receivers, and platform operators affect the stability of the governance of informational platforms. The purpose of this study was to identify and explore the sustainable factors of a platform ecosystem for health and fitness apps across Mainland China and Taiwan by interviewing producers, receivers, and operators. An advanced analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was applied to derive expert perspectives from apps users and operators, live streamers, key opinion leaders, scholars, and officers across Mainland China and Taiwan via four dimensions and fourteen sub-dimensions of the initial health and fitness apps. The results revealed that the weights of the dimensions of health and fitness apps were sorted by content categories, content updates, user reviews, and platform terms; furthermore, the weights of the six highest sub-dimensions were the following: exercise, new feature, functionality, correctness, monitoring, and privacy. Content producers in Taiwan cared the most about the content category, whereas content producers in Mainland China cared the most about user reviews. Information receivers in Taiwan graded the content category the highest, whereas information receivers in Mainland China rated content updates the highest. Platform operators in Taiwan paid most attention to the platform terms, whereas the platform operators in Mainland China were most concerned with the content category. This comparative study can contribute to assisting the health and fitness industry across Mainland China and Taiwan area to provide an overall strategic operative process by identifying the effectiveness of the procedures, estimative processes, and cost reduction to enhance the competitiveness and further improve users’ experiences and satisfaction for the sustainability of health and fitness information platform Ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Wen Lee & Tzu-Chun Huang & Wei-Shiang Lai & Ching Li, 2021. "Sustainability of Health and Fitness Information Platform Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5560-:d:555795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5560/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5560/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luan Chen & Eric Ng & Shyh-Chang Huang & Wei-Ta Fang, 2017. "A Self-Evaluation System of Quality Planning for Tourist Attractions in Taiwan: An Integrated AHP-Delphi Approach from Career Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. A. Gönül Demirel, 2014. "A Study on the Relationships between the Information Disseminator Role of the Manager, Empowered Employees and the Company Performance," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    2. Stefano Duglio & Alessandro Bonadonna & Marilisa Letey & Giovanni Peira & Laura Zavattaro & Giampiero Lombardi, 2019. "Tourism Development in Inner Mountain Areas—The Local Stakeholders’ Point of View through a Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Trung Tran & Thao-Phuong-Thi Trinh & Cuong-Minh Le & Linh-Khanh Hoang & Hiep-Hung Pham, 2020. "Research as a Base for Sustainable Development of Universities: Using the Delphi Method to Explore Factors Affecting International Publishing among Vietnamese Academic Staff," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Pyungyong Park & Donghan Kim & Sangmin Lee & Jaehoon Whang, 2018. "Toward an Economically Sustainable Casino Industry: A Development of Customer Value Indicators Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Mireia Ferri Sanz & Estrella Durá Ferrandis & Jorge Garcés Ferrer, 2019. "Service Quality Scales and Tourists with Special Needs: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Szu-Hsien Peng, 2019. "Landscape Assessment for Stream Regulation Works in a Watershed Using the Analytic Network Process (ANP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Johannes Enzmann & Marc Ringel, 2020. "Reducing Road Transport Emissions in Europe: Investigating A Demand Side Driven Approach †," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    8. Marzieh Fallah & Lanndon Ocampo, 2021. "The use of the Delphi method with non-parametric analysis for identifying sustainability criteria and indicators in evaluating ecotourism management: the case of Penang National Park (Malaysia)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 45-62, March.
    9. Talib Hussain & Benqian Li & Dake Wang, 2018. "What Factors Influence the Sustainable Tour Process in Social Media Usage? Examining a Rural Mountain Region in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Chunxiang Zhang & You-Yu Dai & Xiaowei Jin & Yiwan Yang, 2022. "Land Reclamation Tourism Resources in China: Connotation, Classification, and Evaluation," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    11. Luis Encalada & Inês Boavida-Portugal & Carlos Cardoso Ferreira & Jorge Rocha, 2017. "Identifying Tourist Places of Interest Based on Digital Imprints: Towards a Sustainable Smart City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Alecxandrina Deaconu & Elena Mădălina Dedu & Ramona Ștefania Igreț & Cătălina Radu, 2018. "The Use of Information and Communications Technology in Vocational Education and Training—Premise of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5560-:d:555795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.