IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5370-d552493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability Assessment of Residential Photovoltaic Battery Systems in Japan Using Electric Power Big Data

Author

Listed:
  • Tomonori Honda

    (Global Zero Emission Research Center, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Team, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan)

  • Akito Ozawa

    (Global Zero Emission Research Center, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Team, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan)

  • Hiroko Wakamatsu

    (Global Zero Emission Research Center, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Team, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan)

Abstract

Residential photovoltaic (PV) battery systems are key technology in the design of low-carbon and resilient energy systems; however, limited research has assessed their profitability. This study aims to evaluate the economic performance of PV battery systems for end-users. The evaluation takes geological, technological, and socio-economic factors into consideration, thereby making the evaluation more comprehensive. We used PV power generation data and power consumption data of more than 40,000 all-electric houses in Japan. We performed scenario analyses with a sensitivity analysis. The results showed that residential PV battery systems were highly profitable when their storage battery operation modes were appropriately utilized at the end of the purchase period for solar power generation in Japan’s feed-in-tariff (FIT) scheme. The profitability, however, varied across regions. The results also indicated that the PV self-consumption rate was more than 50% when charging the battery with surplus power. The results of the sensitivity analysis suggested that the unit prices of grid electricity and the purchasing price of surplus power after the FIT scheme had a significant effect on the profitability of residential PV battery systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomonori Honda & Akito Ozawa & Hiroko Wakamatsu, 2021. "Profitability Assessment of Residential Photovoltaic Battery Systems in Japan Using Electric Power Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5370-:d:552493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaschub, Thomas & Jochem, Patrick & Fichtner, Wolf, 2016. "Solar energy storage in German households: profitability, load changes and flexibility," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 520-532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Fett & Dogan Keles & Thomas Kaschub & Wolf Fichtner, 2019. "Impacts of self-generation and self-consumption on German household electricity prices," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 867-891, September.
    2. Hannes Schwarz & Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2018. "Two-stage stochastic, large-scale optimization of a decentralized energy system: a case study focusing on solar PV, heat pumps and storage in a residential quarter," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 265-310, January.
    3. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    4. Gallego-Castillo, Cristobal & Heleno, Miguel & Victoria, Marta, 2021. "Self-consumption for energy communities in Spain: A regional analysis under the new legal framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Yang, Fei-fei & Zhao, Xin-gang, 2018. "Policies and economic efficiency of China's distributed photovoltaic and energy storage industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 221-230.
    6. Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "An innovation system perspective on the drivers of soft cost reduction for photovoltaic deployment: The case of Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 273-286.
    7. Henni, Sarah & Staudt, Philipp & Weinhardt, Christof, 2021. "A sharing economy for residential communities with PV-coupled battery storage: Benefits, pricing and participant matching," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    8. Gorman, Will & Barbose, Galen & Pablo Carvallo, Juan & Baik, Sunhee & Miller, Chandler & White, Philip & Praprost, Marlena, 2023. "County-level assessment of behind-the-meter solar and storage to mitigate long duration power interruptions for residential customers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    9. Espinoza, R. & Muñoz-Cerón, E. & Aguilera, J. & de la Casa, J., 2019. "Feasibility evaluation of residential photovoltaic self-consumption projects in Peru," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 414-427.
    10. Claudia Gunther & Wolf-Peter Schill & Alexander Zerrahn, 2019. "Prosumage of solar electricity: tariff design, capacity investments, and power system effects," Papers 1907.09855, arXiv.org.
    11. Fett, Daniel & Fraunholz, Christoph & Keles, Dogan, 2021. "Diffusion and system impact of residential battery storage under different regulatory settings," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Hoarau, Quentin & Perez, Yannick, 2019. "Network tariff design with prosumers and electromobility: Who wins, who loses?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-39.
    13. Vale, A.M. & Felix, D.G. & Fortes, M.Z. & Borba, B.S.M.C. & Dias, B.H. & Santelli, B.S., 2017. "Analysis of the economic viability of a photovoltaic generation project applied to the Brazilian housing program “Minha Casa Minha Vida”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 292-298.
    14. Lopez, A. & Ogayar, B. & Hernández, J.C. & Sutil, F.S., 2020. "Survey and assessment of technical and economic features for the provision of frequency control services by household-prosumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2021. "Rate design with distributed energy resources and electric vehicles: A Californian case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Nomaguchi, Yutaka & Tanaka, Hiroki & Sakakibara, Akiyuki & Fujita, Kikuo & Kishita, Yusuke & Hara, Keishiro & Uwasu, Michinori, 2017. "Integrated planning of low-voltage power grids and subsidies toward a distributed generation system – Case study of the diffusion of photovoltaics in a Japanese dormitory town," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 779-793.
    17. Bertsch, Valentin & Geldermann, Jutta & Lühn, Tobias, 2017. "What drives the profitability of household PV investments, self-consumption and self-sufficiency?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1-15.
    18. Hoarau, Quentin & Perez, Yannick, 2018. "Interactions between electric mobility and photovoltaic generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 510-522.
    19. Günther, Claudia & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2021. "Prosumage of solar electricity: Tariff design, capacity investments, and power sector effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Keuchel, Stephan & Jacobs, Leif & Laurenz, Karolyn, 2019. "Owners of energy-efficient houses as a target group for sustainable electric mobility," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 254-262.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5370-:d:552493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.