IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p249-d470213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BIM-Enabled Virtual Reality (VR) for Sustainability Life Cycle and Cost Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Aliakbar Kamari

    (Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Ashwin Paari

    (Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Henrik Øien Torvund

    (Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark)

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) is receiving ever-increasing attention and is utilized by many construction companies in their current practices. This paper aims at a critical investigation of the impact of VR technology on how sustainability and cost are understood and perceived by the users in building design projects, which could lead to improving and supporting the actual building design processes. The research study focused on evaluating design alternatives using Building Information Modeling (BIM)-enabled VR technology integrated with cost and sustainability life cycle assessment (LCA) software. In doing so, the paper begins with reviewing the relevant literature in the mentioned areas. Thereafter, it adopts an experimental-qualitative-quantitative method to test the research hypothesis and analyze the effects of 360-degree VR on the users (66 participants), while distinguishing between users who have a relevant background in building/construction engineering (i.e., architect engineers and civil engineers), and those who have not (i.e., owners and clients). It is observed that despite their background, the user participants positively embrace the ideas and aspirations of sustainability, and that there is some evidence of respondents preferring the economy over sustainability. Likewise, the participants are not making an effort to measure the emissions of their design options rather than focus on the building’s economic aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliakbar Kamari & Ashwin Paari & Henrik Øien Torvund, 2020. "BIM-Enabled Virtual Reality (VR) for Sustainability Life Cycle and Cost Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:249-:d:470213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/249/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/249/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seyfang, Gill, 2010. "Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7624-7633, December.
    2. Aliakbar Kamari & Stefan Jensen & Maria Leonhard Christensen & Steffen Petersen & Poul Henning Kirkegaard, 2018. "A hybrid Decision Support System for Generation of Holistic Renovation Scenarios—Cases of Energy Consumption, Investment Cost, and Thermal Indoor Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Grzegorz Leszczyński & Mariell Velasquez-Serrano, 2022. "Sustainable Value Co-Production and Co-Creation in Virtual Reality: An Exploratory Research on Business-to-Business Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Wenling & Zhang, Jinyun & Bluemling, Bettina & Mol, Arthur P.J. & Wang, Can, 2015. "Public participation in energy saving retrofitting of residential buildings in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 287-296.
    2. David Gibbs & Kirstie O'Neill, 2014. "Rethinking Sociotechnical Transitions and Green Entrepreneurship: The Potential for Transformative Change in the Green Building Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(5), pages 1088-1107, May.
    3. Tiia-Lotta Pekkanen, 2021. "Institutions and Agency in the Sustainability of Day-to-Day Consumption Practices: An Institutional Ethnographic Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 241-260, January.
    4. Manisha Anantharaman, 2018. "Critical sustainable consumption: a research agenda," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 553-561, December.
    5. Jingci Xie & Jianjian Liu & Xin Huo & Qingchun Meng & Mengyu Chu, 2021. "Fresh Food Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon and Freshness Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    6. Matschoss, Kaisa & Mikkonen, Irmeli & Gynther, Lea & Koukoufikis, Giorgos & Uihlein, Andreas & Murauskaite-Bull, Ingrida, 2022. "Drawing policy insights from social innovation cases in the energy field," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Antonio Artino & Riccardo Caponetto & Gianpiero Evola & Giuseppe Margani & Edoardo Michele Marino & Emanuele Murgano, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Sustainable Seismic and Energy Renovation of Buildings: Methodological Layout," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté, 2017. "A Framework for Integrating Ecosystem Services into China’s Circular Economy: The Case of Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Lin, Dan & Simmons, David, 2017. "Structured inter-network collaboration: Public participation in tourism planning in Southern China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 315-328.
    10. Trivess Moore & Andréanne Doyon, 2018. "The Uncommon Nightingale: Sustainable Housing Innovation in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Wang, Zhaohua & Liu, Qiang & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Chad Stephen Boda, 2018. "Community as a Key Word: A Heuristic for Action-Oriented Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Zhao, Dong-Xue & He, Bao-Jie & Johnson, Christine & Mou, Ben, 2015. "Social problems of green buildings: From the humanistic needs to social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1594-1609.
    14. Mazen J. Al-Kheetan & Juliana Byzyka & Seyed Hamidreza Ghaffar, 2021. "Sustainable Valorisation of Silane-Treated Waste Glass Powder in Concrete Pavement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Innocent, Morgane & Francois-Lecompte, Agnès, 2018. "The values of electricity saving for consumers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 136-146.
    16. Robert H W Boyer, 2015. "Grassroots Innovation for Urban Sustainability: Comparing the Diffusion Pathways of Three Ecovillage Projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 320-337, February.
    17. Nadaï, Alain & Labussière, Olivier & Debourdeau, Ariane & Régnier, Yannick & Cointe, Béatrice & Dobigny, Laure, 2015. "French policy localism: Surfing on ‘Positive Energie Territories’ (Tepos)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 281-291.
    18. Marchand, Robert D. & Koh, S.C. Lenny & Morris, Jonathan C., 2015. "Delivering energy efficiency and carbon reduction schemes in England: Lessons from Green Deal Pioneer Places," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 96-106.
    19. Jakub Adamec & Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák, 2021. "How to Measure Sustainable Housing: A Proposal for an Indicator-Based Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Hossain, Mokter, 2018. "Grassroots innovation: The state of the art and future perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 63-69.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:249-:d:470213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.