Author
Listed:
- Mengzhuo Cao
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310012, China
Institute of Environmental Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China)
- Shanying He
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310012, China)
- Ejazul Islam
(National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)
- Chunlai Hong
(Institute of Environmental Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China)
- Weiping Wang
(Institute of Environmental Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China)
- Yanlai Yao
(Institute of Environmental Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China)
- Xiaoyang Chen
(Institute of Environmental Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China)
- Fengxiang Zhu
(Institute of Environmental Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China)
Abstract
With rapid economic and industrial development, the potentially toxic element (PTE) pollution of farmlands in China has become increasingly serious. Based on the Hakanson potential ecological risk index (RI) and national food pollutant limit standards (GB 2762-2017), the effects of exogenous potentially toxic elements (PTEs), i.e., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg), on rice growth were studied. Common varieties of hybrid (YY 538, CY 84) and conventional (XS 134, JH 218) rice were grown in pots having representative paddy soil from Zhejiang Province, China. The results showed that As and Hg in soil significantly inhibited growth; however, the plant height of hybrid rice was less affected. Further, there were significant correlations between concentrations of PTEs in soil and rice grains; however, hybrid rice had a stronger ability to absorb and accumulate PTEs. The comprehensive potential ecological RI of soil PTEs was 39.4–89.9, which is below the level of ‘minor ecological hazard’, and the contribution rate of Hg was 79.9%–84.2%; as such, Hg posed the greatest potential ecological risk in the study area. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg in the safe production of different rice varieties decreased in the order XS 134 > JH 218 > YY 538 > CY 84. The ecological risk limits of As and Hg for conventional rice were higher, and the risk limits of As and Hg for hybrid rice were lower, than the limit of the soil environmental quality assessment index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)” (GB15618-2018). The health risk limit of soil As in the typical paddy soil of China decreased in the order XS 134 > JH 218 > CY 84 > YY 538. The health risk limit of Hg decreased in the order XS 134 > JH 218 > YY 538 > CY 84. The health risk limit of As was lower, whereas the risk limit of Hg was higher, than the limit of the soil environmental quality evaluation index in the national “Soil quality control criteria for soil pollution in agricultural land (for trial implementation) (Trial)”(GB15618-2018).
Suggested Citation
Mengzhuo Cao & Shanying He & Ejazul Islam & Chunlai Hong & Weiping Wang & Yanlai Yao & Xiaoyang Chen & Fengxiang Zhu, 2020.
"As-Hg Compound Pollution: Rice Growth, Yield, and Environmental Safety Limits,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2868-:d:341282
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- HUANG, Yanfei & CHEN, Guifen & XIONG, Liumei & HUANG, Yuyi, 2016.
"Current Situation of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil and Phytoremediation Application,"
Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 8(01), pages 1-3, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2868-:d:341282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.