IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2693-d338659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Stochastic Interpolation-Based Fractal Model for Vulnerability Diagnosis of Water Supply Networks Against Seismic Hazards

Author

Listed:
  • Chaofeng Liu

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
    Hebei Province Engineering Technology Research Center, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Yawei Li

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • He Yin

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Jiaxin Zhang

    (College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China)

  • Wei Wang

    (Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

Historical seismic events show that water supply networks are increasingly vulnerable to seismic damage, especially in a violent earthquake, which leads to an unprecedented level of risk. Evaluation of vulnerability to seismic hazards can be considered as one of the first steps of risk management and mitigation. This paper presents a stochastic interpolation-based fractal model for assessing the physical vulnerability of urban water supply pipelines. Firstly, based on the formation mechanism of natural disaster risk and the concept of seismic vulnerability, the most representative factors were selected as the vulnerability evaluation indices, and the classification criterion of each index was teased out according to the earthquake damage investigations and researches on the aseismatic behavior of water supply pipelines. Secondly, considering the randomness of vulnerability to earthquake hazards, the test data set was produced by way of stochastic interpolation according to the uniform distribution, on the basis of the classification criterion. The fractal dimensions of all of the indices were calculated based on the test data set. The fractal interpolation diagnosis function for identifying the vulnerability levels of pipelines to earthquake disasters was established. Finally, the application of the proposed model to a real water supply network and its comparative analysis showed that the water supply network was basically in a medium vulnerability level. Through the case study verification, we could find that the model was theoretically and practically feasible. This study helps to gain a better understanding of the extents of potential vulnerability levels of water supply pipelines. It can provide technical support for disaster prevention plans of urban water supply networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaofeng Liu & Yawei Li & He Yin & Jiaxin Zhang & Wei Wang, 2020. "A Stochastic Interpolation-Based Fractal Model for Vulnerability Diagnosis of Water Supply Networks Against Seismic Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2693-:d:338659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turner, Jonathan P. & Qiao, Jianhong & Lawley, Mark & Richard, Jean-Philippe & Abraham, Dulcy M., 2012. "Mitigating shortage and distribution costs in damaged water networks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 315-326.
    2. S. Balica & N. Wright & F. Meulen, 2012. "A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(1), pages 73-105, October.
    3. Selcuk Toprak & Filiz Taskin, 2007. "Estimation of Earthquake Damage to Buried Pipelines Caused by Ground Shaking," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 40(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Francesco Gentile & Tiziana Bisantino & Giuliana Trisorio Liuzzi, 2008. "Debris-flow risk analysis in south Gargano watersheds (Southern-Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 44(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vaclav Beran & Marek Teichmann & Frantisek Kuda & Renata Zdarilova, 2020. "Dynamics of Regional Development in Regional and Municipal Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Marek Teichmann & Dagmar Kuta & Stanislav Endel & Natalie Szeligova, 2020. "Modeling and Optimization of the Drinking Water Supply Network—A System Case Study from the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Zi-Yun Zhang & Fang-Le Peng & Chen-Xiao Ma & Hui Zhang & Su-Juan Fu, 2021. "External Benefit Assessment of Urban Utility Tunnels Based on Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Mousavi & Mostafa Hesari & Alireza Azarbakht, 2014. "Seismic risk assessment of the 3rd Azerbaijan gas pipeline in Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1327-1348, December.
    2. Hossain, Mohammad Khalid & Meng, Qingmin, 2020. "A fine-scale spatial analytics of the assessment and mapping of buildings and population at different risk levels of urban flood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    4. Xinlu XIE & Yan ZHENG & Jiahua PAN & Hongjian ZHOU, 2018. "Urban Vulnerability and Adaptability to Climate Change: A Case Study of Cities in the Yangtze River Delta," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Hui Xu & Junlong Gao & Xinchun Yu & Qianqian Qin & Shiqiang Du & Jiahong Wen, 2024. "Assessment of Rainstorm Waterlogging Disaster Risk in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas Based on Land Use Scenario Simulation: A Case Study of Jiangqiao Town in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Jhantu Dey & Sayani Mazumder, 2023. "Development of an integrated coastal vulnerability index and its application to the low-lying Mandarmani–Dadanpatrabar coastal sector, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3243-3273, April.
    7. Antje Otto & Kristine Kern & Wolfgang Haupt & Peter Eckersley & Annegret H. Thieken, 2021. "Ranking local climate policy: assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Vitor Baccarin Zanetti & Wilson Cabral De Sousa Junior & Débora M. De Freitas, 2016. "A Climate Change Vulnerability Index and Case Study in a Brazilian Coastal City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-12, August.
    9. Weijiang Li & Jiahong Wen & Bo Xu & Xiande Li & Shiqiang Du, 2018. "Integrated Assessment of Economic Losses in Manufacturing Industry in Shanghai Metropolitan Area Under an Extreme Storm Flood Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Caridad Ballesteros & José A. Jiménez & Christophe Viavattene, 2018. "A multi-component flood risk assessment in the Maresme coast (NW Mediterranean)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 265-292, January.
    11. Subhankar Chakraborty & Sutapa Mukhopadhyay, 2019. "Assessing flood risk using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS): application in Coochbehar district of West Bengal, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 247-274, October.
    12. Li, Sheng & Nadolnyak, Denis & Hartarska, Valentina, 2019. "Agricultural land conversion: Impacts of economic and natural risk factors in a coastal area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 380-390.
    13. Andrés García-Ruiz & Manuel Díez-Minguito & Konstantin Verichev & Manuel Carpio, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Urban Coastal Development: Strategies for Climate-Resilient Timber Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Akiko Masuya & Ashraf Dewan & Robert Corner, 2015. "Population evacuation: evaluating spatial distribution of flood shelters and vulnerable residential units in Dhaka with geographic information systems," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 1859-1882, September.
    15. M. A. Hoque & P. F. D. Scheelbeek & P. Vineis & A. E. Khan & K. M. Ahmed & A. P. Butler, 2016. "Drinking water vulnerability to climate change and alternatives for adaptation in coastal South and South East Asia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 247-263, May.
    16. Abdur Rahim Hamidi & Jiangwei Wang & Shiyao Guo & Zhongping Zeng, 2020. "Flood vulnerability assessment using MOVE framework: a case study of the northern part of district Peshawar, Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(2), pages 385-408, March.
    17. Zhiyi Lin & Minerva Singh, 2024. "Assessing Coastal Vulnerability and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natural Habitats in Enhancing Coastal Resilience: A Case Study in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Yao An & Ning Liu & Lin Zhang & Huanhuan Zheng, 2022. "Adapting to climate risks through cross-border investments: industrial vulnerability and smart city resilience," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-29, September.
    19. Aishwarya Narendr & S. Vinay & Bharath Haridas Aithal & Sutapa Das, 2022. "Multi-dimensional parametric coastal flood risk assessment at a regional scale using GIS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9569-9597, July.
    20. Fabiana Navia Miranda & Tiago Miguel Ferreira, 2019. "A simplified approach for flood vulnerability assessment of historic sites," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(2), pages 713-730, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2693-:d:338659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.