IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2372-d333893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Attractiveness of Adaptive Heritage Reuse: A Theoretical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-Ming Tu

    (Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

Abstract

Adaptive heritage reuse is a useful method to bring new meaning into a culture, manage heritage sites, and promote tourism development. However, it is not always successful, and there is no theoretical framework to understand its attractiveness and value. This study aimed at developing such a theoretical framework based on the analysis of nine cases of adaptive heritage reuse in Taiwan. The probe question technique of qualitative interview was used to assess the attraction framework. A total of 90 respondents were interviewed based on constant comparative analysis with the sampling strategy of theoretical saturation. The results illustrate the heritage and activities of the reuse environments, including natural and regional environments. These environments produce recreational values, including self-growth, health benefits, and social benefits. As promoting activities is an important attraction for tourists in the heritage reuse environment, the natural environment can be used to plan and design heritage outdoor activities. Finally, the regional environment can be an important basis for assessing the feasibility of adaptive heritage reuse, including historical streets, surrounding tourist attractions, and high transportation accessibility. This theoretical framework can be used to achieve sustainable management of heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "The Attractiveness of Adaptive Heritage Reuse: A Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2372-:d:333893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaczynski, A.T. & Potwarka, L.R. & Saelens P, B.E., 2008. "Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(8), pages 1451-1456.
    2. Paola M. Leanza & Simona M. C. Porto & Vincenzo Sapienza & Santi M. Cascone, 2016. "A Heritage Interpretation-Based Itinerary to Enhance Tourist Use of Traditional Rural Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Shahrbanoo Gholitabar & Habib Alipour & Carlos Manuel Martins da Costa, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation of Architectural Heritage Management Implications for Tourism: The Case of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yasmine Sabry Hegazi & Heidi Ahmed Shalaby & Mady A. A. Mohamed, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse Decisions for Historic Buildings in Relation to Energy Efficiency and Thermal Comfort—Cairo Citadel, a Case Study from Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Wenjun Jiao & Xiao Yang & Qingwen Min, 2022. "A Review of the Progress in Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Oluwatobi Mary Owojori & Chioma Sylvia Okoro & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Management: Exploring Dimensions of Pull and Push Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Hung-Ming Tu, 2022. "Confirmative biophilic framework for heritage management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Elena Rudan, 2023. "Circular Economy of Cultural Heritage—Possibility to Create a New Tourism Product through Adaptive Reuse," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Mimica R. Milošević & Dušan M. Milošević & Ana D. Stanojević & Dragan M. Stević & Dušan J. Simjanović, 2021. "Fuzzy and Interval AHP Approaches in Sustainable Management for the Architectural Heritage in Smart Cities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, February.
    8. Ayşegül Durukan & Şebnem Ertaş Beşir & Selver Koç Altuntaş & Mikail Açıkel, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainability Principles in Adaptable Re-Functioning: Traditional Residences in Demirel Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Management: Exploring Dimensions of Pull and Push Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Xiaohu Zhang & Scott Melbourne & Chinmoy Sarkar & Alain Chiaradia & Chris Webster, 2020. "Effects of green space on walking: Does size, shape and density matter?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3402-3420, December.
    3. Julian A. Reed & Rachel M. Ballard & Michael Hill & David Berrigan, 2020. "Identification of Effective Programs to Improve Access to and Use of Trails among Youth from Under-Resourced Communities: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-33, October.
    4. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    5. Shirelle H. Hallum & Marilyn E. Wende & Farnaz Hesam Shariati & Kelsey M. Thomas & Anna L. Chupak & Eleanor Witherspoon & Andrew T. Kaczynski, 2024. "Unearthing Inequities in the Relationship between Multiple Sociodemographic Factors and Diverse Elements of Park Availability and Quality in a Major Southern Metropolitan Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Karolina Dudzic-Gyurkovich, 2023. "Study of Centrality Measures in the Network of Green Spaces in the City of Krakow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    7. Michael Lechner & Paul Downward, 2017. "Heterogeneous sports participation and labour market outcomes in England," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 335-348, January.
    8. Dana Badau & Adela Badau, 2018. "The motric, Educational, Recreational and Satisfaction Impact of Adventure Education Activities in the Urban Tourism Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Sera Kim & Honghyok Kim & Jong-Tae Lee, 2019. "Interactions between Ambient Air Particles and Greenness on Cause-specific Mortality in Seven Korean Metropolitan Cities, 2008–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-10, May.
    10. Qiang Sheng & Dongyang Wan & Boya Yu, 2021. "Effect of Space Configurational Attributes on Social Interactions in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Mohammad Paydar & Asal Kamani Fard & Verónica Gárate Navarrete, 2023. "Design Characteristics, Visual Qualities, and Walking Behavior in an Urban Park Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Fangzheng Li & Fen Zhang & Xiong Li & Peng Wang & Junhui Liang & Yuting Mei & Wenwen Cheng & Yun Qian, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of the Use of Urban Green Spaces and External Factors Contributing to Their Use in Central Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Razieh Zandieh & Javier Martinez & Johannes Flacke, 2019. "Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking and Inequalities in Neighbourhood Green Spaces Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Ho, Hung Chak & Cheng, Wei & Song, Yimeng & Liu, Yuqi & Guo, Yingqi & Lu, Shiyu & Lum, Terry Yat Sang & Chiu, Rebecca & Webster, Chris, 2022. "Spatial uncertainty and environment-health association: An empirical study of osteoporosis among “old residents” in public housing estates across a hilly environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    15. Irina Iulia Năstase & Ileana Pătru-Stupariu & Felix Kienast, 2019. "Landscape Preferences and Distance Decay Analysis for Mapping the Recreational Potential of an Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Ying Xu & David Matarrita-Cascante & Jae Ho Lee & A.E. Luloff, 2019. "Incorporating Physical Environment-Related Factors in an Assessment of Community Attachment: Understanding Urban Park Contributions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Celia Bilbao-Terol & Verónica Cañal-Fernández & Luis Valdés & Eduardo Del Valle, 2017. "Rural Tourism Accommodation Prices by Land Use-Based Hedonic Approach: First Results from the Case Study of the Self-Catering Cottages in Asturias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Meryem Hayir-Kanat & Jürgen Breuste, 2020. "Outdoor Recreation Participation in Istanbul, Turkey: An Investigation of Frequency, Length, Travel Time and Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Teck Hong Tan, 2022. "Perceived Environmental Attributes: Their Impact on Older Adults’ Mental Health in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    20. Simon Bell & Himansu Sekhar Mishra & Lewis R. Elliott & Rebecca Shellock & Peeter Vassiljev & Miriam Porter & Zoe Sydenham & Mathew P. White, 2020. "Urban Blue Acupuncture: A Protocol for Evaluating a Complex Landscape Design Intervention to Improve Health and Wellbeing in a Coastal Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2372-:d:333893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.