IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2265-d332361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and Reliability of Self-Perception-Based Submaximal Fitness Tests in Young Adult Females: An Educational Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro Luigi Invernizzi

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20129 Milan, Italy)

  • Gabriele Signorini

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20129 Milan, Italy)

  • Andrea Bosio

    (Human Performance Laboratory, Mapei Sport, 21057 Olgiate Olona (VA), Italy)

  • Gaetano Raiola

    (Department of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Raffaele Scurati

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20129 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Background: In physical activity, testing procedures generally require maximal efforts. They are not always administrable or appropriate (e.g., with beginners, elderly, or in school); therefore, alternative submaximal procedures might be more fitting. This study aimed to assess the criterion validity and reliability of submaximal tests based on perceptual variables to be used instead of the corresponding maximal procedures to evaluate muscular endurance, flexibility, and cardiorespiratory fitness. The sustainability of this “educational” rationale to achieve the individual self-government and self-determination of testing and exercising has been further discussed. Methods: A total of 16 female gym practitioners (age 23 ± 3 years) performed five submaximal tests (push-up, S-PU; crunch, S-CR; wall-sit, S-WS; bending forward, S-BF; Step test, S-ST), whose results were compared to those from the corresponding maximal tests (push-up, PU; crunch, CR; wall-sit, WS; sit-and-reach, S&R; Yo-yo, YY). Results: The Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was higher than 0.8 in all of the submaximal tests. High correlations were found between all submaximal and maximal tests except between YY and S-ST, though their mean heart rates were correlated. Conclusions: Submaximal tests based on an internal load at about 50% of the maximal perceived exertion are equally valid and reliable to the corresponding gold-standard maximal tests, except for the cardiorespiratory evaluation. The educational rationale of this study supports self-acting as a calibration mechanism of physical activity, promoting a proper use of the body but not its overuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Luigi Invernizzi & Gabriele Signorini & Andrea Bosio & Gaetano Raiola & Raffaele Scurati, 2020. "Validity and Reliability of Self-Perception-Based Submaximal Fitness Tests in Young Adult Females: An Educational Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2265-:d:332361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2265/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2265/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pietro Luigi Invernizzi & Gabriele Signorini & Raffaele Scurati & Giovanni Michielon & Stefano Benedini & Andrea Bosio & Walter Staiano, 2022. "The UP150: A Multifactorial Environmental Intervention to Promote Employee Physical and Mental Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2265-:d:332361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.