IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1589-d322937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Mens Sana in Sound Corporations”: A Principled Reconciliation Between Profitability and Responsibility, With a Focus on Environmental Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Octavian-Dragomir Jora

    (The Department of International Business and Economics, The Faculty of International Business and Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Matei-Alexandru Apăvăloaei

    (The Department of International Business and Economics, The Faculty of International Business and Economics, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Vlad I. Roșca

    (The Department of Business Administration (UNESCO), The Faculty of Business Administration (in Foreign Languages), The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihaela Iacob

    (The Department of Finance, The Faculty of Finance and Banking, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a praised and promoted business behavior nowadays, widely understood as the entrepreneurs’ and managers’ attempts to make amends for some of the excesses that their economic activities bring about, for instance with regard to environmental negative externalities or to public ecological assets under-provision. It is of utmost importance to duly process and profess the CSR concept, one placed at a subtle interplay between business profitability and civic/social responsibility, between economic and ethical/legal realms, since the misrepresentation of economic agents’ benchmark of proper conduct might harm both social landscape and ecological environment. Still, despite its rich occurrence in scholarly literature as well as recurrence in business practices, CSR requires both further and thorough clarification, since many studies postulate that the free-market mindset is rather dismissive of CSR solicitudes. The current research paper fills such a sensitive conceptual gap by explaining why CSR regards are logically compatible with the free markets, with no reason to decree a market failure in this matter. The work takes the form of an analytical research, of an explicitly conceptual nature, based on praxeologically-deductive argumentation, documenting the fundamental compatibility of CSR with the free market order, populated by profit-driven capitalist corporations that, far from being reckless, are disciplined by the rule of law of clearly defined, defended, divestible property rights. As such, the plea adopted the methodological acquis of the Austrian School of law and economics. The main findings of the present study reveal that (a) in economic commonsense, the “profit motive” is the prima facia rule of judiciousness as the care for third-parties’ welfare can be ensured only after own well-being has been secured, while (b) ethically, “social responsibility”, as an extra-contractual duty, does build up on top of, not as trade-off with a robust property rights order.

Suggested Citation

  • Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Matei-Alexandru Apăvăloaei & Vlad I. Roșca & Mihaela Iacob, 2020. "“Mens Sana in Sound Corporations”: A Principled Reconciliation Between Profitability and Responsibility, With a Focus on Environmental Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1589-:d:322937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1589/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1589/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pham Nhat Tan & Phan Quyen Phu Thi & Tučková Zuzana & Vo Nga & Nguyen Lien H.L., 2018. "Enhancing the organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the roles of green training and organizational culture," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 1174-1189, December.
    2. de Soto Jesus Huerta, 1998. "The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 75-114, March.
    3. repec:bpj:jeehcn:v:8:y:1998:i:1:p:75-114:n:4 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Rothschild, Emma, 1994. "Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 319-322, May.
    5. Peter Leeson & J. Subrick, 2006. "Robust political economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 107-111, June.
    6. James Cordeiro & Manish Tewari, 2015. "Firm Characteristics, Industry Context, and Investor Reactions to Environmental CSR: A Stakeholder Theory Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 833-849, September.
    7. Dubbink, Wim, 2004. "The Fragile Structure of Free-Market Society," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 23-46, January.
    8. Williamson, Oliver E, 1981. "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1537-1568, December.
    9. Mihaela Iacob & Rodica Gherghina & Georgiana Camelia Cre?an, 2019. "„Comparative (Bio)Economic Systems” in Terms of Social Responsibility: The Natural Environment – Between Ideal Capitalism, Utopian Socialism and Real-World Interventionism," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 707-707, August.
    10. Foss,Nicolai J. & Klein,Peter G., 2012. "Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521697262, January.
    11. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Mihai-Vladimir Topan & Radu Cristian Musetescu & Matei-Alexandru Apavaloaei, 2015. "“Corporate Scene Investigation”: A Praxeological Attempt to Sketch the Profile of the Entrepreneur in Modern Business," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 456-456, February.
    12. Salerno, Joseph T, 1993. "Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized: Review Essay," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 113-146.
    13. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan, 2007. "Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 247-254.
    14. Talat Islam & Ghulam Ali & Humaira Asad, 2018. "Environmental CSR and pro-environmental behaviors to reduce environmental dilapidation," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(3), pages 332-351, October.
    15. Murray Rothbard, 1982. "Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 55-99, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nedef Matei-Ștefan, 2024. "Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Turbulent Times: Revisiting the Concept and Prospecting Its Developments," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1971-1978.
    2. Smirna Tudor Gherasim & Ifrim Mihaela & Topan Mihai Vladimir & Stamate-Ștefan Andreas, 2023. "Central Bank Digital Currencies Analyzed in a Banking School versus Currency School Framework," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 638-648, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Hongsong Wang & Vicente Moreno-Casas & Jesús Huerta de Soto, 2021. "A Free-Market Environmentalist Transition toward Renewable Energy: The Cases of Germany, Denmark, and the United Kingdom," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Jeffrey E. Haymond & Whitton A. Rice, 2022. "Lean Startup: A Bridge between Austrian Views of Entrepreneurship," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 37(Winter 20), pages 61-76.
    3. Octavian-Dragomir Jora & Mihai-Vladimir Topan & Radu Cristian Musetescu & Matei-Alexandru Apavaloaei, 2015. "“Corporate Scene Investigation”: A Praxeological Attempt to Sketch the Profile of the Entrepreneur in Modern Business," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 456-456, February.
    4. Peter Klein & Per Bylund, 2014. "The place of Austrian economics in contemporary entrepreneurship research," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 27(3), pages 259-279, September.
    5. Victor I. Espinosa & José Antonio Peña-Ramos & Fátima Recuero-López, 2021. "The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking: Evidence from Spain’s Support Policies for Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269, December.
    7. Vicente Moreno‐Casas & Philipp Bagus, 2022. "Dynamic efficiency and economic complexity," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 115-134, February.
    8. Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson, 2019. "The collaborative innovation bloc: A reply to our commentators," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 349-361, December.
    9. Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein & Matthew McCaffrey, 2019. "The entrepreneurship scholar plays with blocs: Collaborative innovation or collaborative judgment?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 321-330, December.
    10. Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph D’Andrea, 2020. "Strategic marketing & Austrian economics: The foundations of resource-advantage theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 481-501, December.
    11. William Hongsong Wang & Victor I. Espinosa & Jesús Huerta de Soto, 2022. "A Free-Market Environmentalist Enquiry on Spain’s Energy Transition along with Its Recent Increasing Electricity Prices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-34, August.
    12. Eduardo Fernández Luiña & Santiago Fernández Ordóñez & William Hongsong Wang, 2022. "The Community Commitment to Sustainability: Forest Protection in Guatemala," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Ennio E. Piano & Louis Rouanet, 2020. "Economic calculation and the organization of markets," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 331-348, September.
    14. Frederic Sautet, 2018. "The battle for the essence of entrepreneurship," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 123-139, March.
    15. Nicolai J. Foss, 2012. "Linking Ethics and Economic Growth: a Comment on Hunt," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 6(3), September.
    16. Loïc Sauce, 2017. "Market process(es) and (un)knowledge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 305-321, September.
    17. Anthony J. Evans, 2016. "The unintended consequences of easy money: How access to finance impedes entrepreneurship," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 233-252, September.
    18. Pasinetti, Luigi L., 2021. "Economic theory and institutions," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 438-442.
    19. T.R.L. Fry & R.D. Brooks & Br. Comley & J. Zhang, 1993. "Economic Motivations for Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variable Models," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 69(2), pages 193-205, June.
    20. Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2018. "Capital Structure of Foreign Direct Investments: A Transaction Cost Analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 389-411, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1589-:d:322937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.