IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1557-d322564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers in Wildlife Crossing Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Bell

    (Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Damon Fick

    (Norm Asbjornson College of Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Rob Ament

    (Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Nina-Marie Lister

    (School of Urban and Regional Planning, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

Abstract

The proven effectiveness of highway crossing infrastructure to mitigate wildlife-vehicle collisions with large animals has made it a preferred method for increasing motorist and animal safety along road networks around the world. The crossing structures also provide safe passage for small- and medium-sized wildlife. Current methods to build these structures use concrete and steel, which often result in high costs due to the long duration of construction and the heavy machinery required to assemble the materials. Recently, engineers and architects are finding new applications of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and low life-cycle costs. This material is better suited to withstand environmental elements and the static and dynamic loads required of wildlife infrastructure. Although carbon and glass fibers along with new synthetic resins are most commonly used, current research suggests an increasing incorporation and use of bio-based and recycled materials. Since FRP bridges are corrosion resistant and hold their structural properties over time, owners of the bridge can benefit by reducing costly and time-consuming maintenance over its lifetime. Adapting FRP bridges for use as wildlife crossing structures can contribute to the long-term goals of improving motorist and passenger safety, conserving wildlife and increasing cost efficiency, while at the same time reducing plastics in landfills.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Bell & Damon Fick & Rob Ament & Nina-Marie Lister, 2020. "The Use of Fiber-Reinforced Polymers in Wildlife Crossing Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1557-:d:322564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trina Rytwinski & Kylie Soanes & Jochen A G Jaeger & Lenore Fahrig & C Scott Findlay & Jeff Houlahan & Rodney van der Ree & Edgar A van der Grift, 2016. "How Effective Is Road Mitigation at Reducing Road-Kill? A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haotong Su & Yun Wang & Yangang Yang & Shuangcheng Tao & Yaping Kong, 2023. "An Analytical Framework of the Factors Affecting Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions and Barriers to Movement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas & Carlo Lavalle, 2023. "Identification of Urban and Wildlife Terrestrial Corridor Intersections for Planning of Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Mitigation Measures," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas, 2021. "Roadkill-Data-Based Identification and Ranking of Mammal Habitats," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-35, May.
    4. Irene Nandutu & Marcellin Atemkeng & Nokubonga Mgqatsa & Sakayo Toadoum Sari & Patrice Okouma & Rockefeller Rockefeller & Theophilus Ansah-Narh & Jean Louis Ebongue Kedieng Fendji & Franklin Tchakount, 2022. "Error Correction Based Deep Neural Networks for Modeling and Predicting South African Wildlife–Vehicle Collision Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Íñigo García-Martínez-de-Albéniz & Juan Antonio Ruiz-de-Villa & Jorge Rodriguez-Hernandez, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions in NW of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Andrius Kučas & Linas Balčiauskas, 2021. "Impact of Road Fencing on Ungulate–Vehicle Collisions and Hotspot Patterns," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Christopher A Lepczyk & Jean E Fantle-Lepczyk & Kathleen Misajon & Darcy Hu & David C Duffy, 2019. "Long-term history of vehicle collisions on the endangered Nēnē (Branta sandvicensis)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1557-:d:322564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.