IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p869-d312511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan M. DeAngelis

    (The Nature Conservancy, URI Bay Campus, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA)

  • Ariana E. Sutton-Grier

    (Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA)

  • Allison Colden

    (Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Annapolis, MD 21403, USA)

  • Katie K. Arkema

    (Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
    School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Christopher J. Baillie

    (Department of Biology and Coastal Studies Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA)

  • Richard O. Bennett

    (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA 01035, USA)

  • Jeff Benoit

    (Restore America’s Estuaries, Arlington, VA 22201, USA)

  • Seth Blitch

    (The Nature Conservancy, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, USA)

  • Anthony Chatwin

    (National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Washington, DC 20005, USA)

  • Alyssa Dausman

    (The Water Institute of the Gulf, Baton Rouge, LA 70802, USA)

  • Rachel K. Gittman

    (Department of Biology and Coastal Studies Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA)

  • Holly S. Greening

    (Coastwise Partners, St. Petersburg, FL 34219, USA)

  • Jessica R. Henkel

    (Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council, New Orleans, LA 70130, USA)

  • Rachel Houge

    (United States Environmental Protection Agency Gulf of Mexico Program, Gulfport, MS 39501, USA)

  • Ron Howard

    (United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Team, Madison, MS 39110, USA)

  • A. Randall Hughes

    (Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Marine Science Center, Nahant, MA 01908, USA)

  • Jeremy Lowe

    (San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA 94804, USA)

  • Steven B. Scyphers

    (Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Marine Science Center, Nahant, MA 01908, USA)

  • Edward T. Sherwood

    (Tampa Bay Estuary Program, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA)

  • Stephanie Westby

    (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Restoration Center, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA)

  • Jonathan H. Grabowski

    (Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Marine Science Center, Nahant, MA 01908, USA)

Abstract

In the United States, extensive investments have been made to restore the ecological function and services of coastal marine habitats. Despite a growing body of science supporting coastal restoration, few studies have addressed the suite of societally enabling conditions that helped facilitate successful restoration and recovery efforts that occurred at meaningful ecological (i.e., ecosystem) scales, and where restoration efforts were sustained for longer (i.e., several years to decades) periods. Here, we examined three case studies involving large-scale and long-term restoration efforts including the seagrass restoration effort in Tampa Bay, Florida, the oyster restoration effort in the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland and Virginia, and the tidal marsh restoration effort in San Francisco Bay, California. The ecological systems and the specifics of the ecological restoration were not the focus of our study. Rather, we focused on the underlying social and political contexts of each case study and found common themes of the factors of restoration which appear to be important for maintaining support for large-scale restoration efforts. Four critical elements for sustaining public and/or political support for large-scale restoration include: (1) resources should be invested in building public support prior to significant investments into ecological restoration; (2) building political support provides a level of significance to the recovery planning efforts and creates motivation to set and achieve meaningful recovery goals; (3) recovery plans need to be science-based with clear, measurable goals that resonate with the public; and (4) the accountability of progress toward reaching goals needs to be communicated frequently and in a way that the general public comprehends. These conclusions may help other communities move away from repetitive, single, and seemingly unconnected restoration projects towards more large-scale, bigger impact, and coordinated restoration efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan M. DeAngelis & Ariana E. Sutton-Grier & Allison Colden & Katie K. Arkema & Christopher J. Baillie & Richard O. Bennett & Jeff Benoit & Seth Blitch & Anthony Chatwin & Alyssa Dausman & Rachel K. , 2020. "Social Factors Key to Landscape-Scale Coastal Restoration: Lessons Learned from Three U.S. Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:869-:d:312511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/869/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/869/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:869-:d:312511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.