Author
Listed:
- Kazeem Adekunle Alayande
(Department of Microbiology, North-West University, Mmabatho 2745, South Africa
Food Security and Safety Niche Area, North-West University, Mmabatho 2745, South Africa)
- Olayinka Ayobami Aiyegoro
(Agricultural Research Council, Animal Production Institute, Gastrointestinal Microbiology and Biotechnology Division, Irene 0062, South Africa)
- Collins Njie Ateba
(Department of Microbiology, North-West University, Mmabatho 2745, South Africa
Food Security and Safety Niche Area, North-West University, Mmabatho 2745, South Africa)
Abstract
Probiotics have been emerging as a safe and viable alternative to antibiotics for increasing performance in livestock. Literature was collated via retrieved information from online databases, viz, PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Besides improved immunomodulation and nutrient digestibility, in-feed probiotics have shown drastic reductions in gastrointestinal tract-invading pathogens. However, every novel probiotic strain cannot be assumed to share historical safety with conventional strains. Any strain not belonging to the wild-type distributions of relevant antimicrobials, or found to be harbouring virulence determinants, should not be developed further. Modes of identification and the transmigration potential of the strains across the gastrointestinal barrier must be scrutinized. Other potential risk factors include the possibility of promoting deleterious metabolic effects, excessive immune stimulation and genetic stability of the strains over time. Adverse effects of probiotics could be strain specific, depending on the prevailing immunological and physiological condition of the host. The most crucial concern is the stability of the strain. Probiotics stand a good chance of replacing antibiotics in animal husbandry. The possibility of the probiotics used in animal feed cross-contaminating the human food chain cannot be downplayed. Thus, the established safety measures in probiotic development must be adhered to for a successful global campaign on food safety and security.
Suggested Citation
Kazeem Adekunle Alayande & Olayinka Ayobami Aiyegoro & Collins Njie Ateba, 2020.
"Probiotics in Animal Husbandry: Applicability and Associated Risk Factors,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1087-:d:316046
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1087-:d:316046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.