IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10657-d465400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Identity Levels in Older Learners: A New Focus for Sustainable Lifelong Education and Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • José Manuel Muñoz-Rodríguez

    (Faculty of Education, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain)

  • María José Hernández-Serrano

    (Faculty of Education, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Carmen Tabernero

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
    Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León (INCYL), Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

Identifying the digital identity of older adults entails an essential step for their effective digital inclusion grounded in a holistic and sustainable human development in hyperconnected societies. This paper proposes a theoretical framework with three levels of digital identity based on motives and practices: location, action, and significance. This framework was used for designing an ad-hoc scale, tested with a sample of senior learners ( n = 659) aged 55 and over involved in active aging programs in Adult Education in Spain. Participants filled out a five-point 20-item Likert scale measuring their agreement with the digital identity factors, along with two complementary scales evaluating their internet uses and motivations, as well as other items on living arrangements and perceived social support. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses showed a factorial structure with three levels of digital identity for older adults. The results revealed that active older adults with diverse motives for using the internet and variety in digital practices recorded a higher digital identity level, as did those who felt more isolated or with less social support. As a conclusion, the educational implications according to instrumental, social, and motivational variables are key for the progressive construction of a digital identity in older adults and for their digital inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • José Manuel Muñoz-Rodríguez & María José Hernández-Serrano & Carmen Tabernero, 2020. "Digital Identity Levels in Older Learners: A New Focus for Sustainable Lifelong Education and Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10657-:d:465400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10657/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10657/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janelle W Myhre & Matthias R Mehl & Elizabeth L Glisky, 2017. "Cognitive Benefits of Online Social Networking for Healthy Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 752-760.
    2. Olfa Bouzaabia & Rym Bouzaabia & Alexandru Capatina, 2016. "Determinants of Internet Use by Senior Generation: A Cross Cultural Study," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 63-82, January.
    3. Simona Vulpe & Andrei Crăciun, 2020. "Silver surfers from a European perspective: technology communication usage among European seniors," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 125-134, March.
    4. Jeehoon Kim & Hee Yun Lee & M Candace Christensen & Joseph R Merighi, 2017. "Technology Access and Use, and Their Associations With Social Engagement Among Older Adults: Do Women and Men Differ?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 836-845.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Kun & Gu, Danan, 2023. "Reciprocal associations between social media use and self-perception of aging among older adults: Do men and women differ?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    2. Anne Juul & Raelene Wilding & Loretta Baldassar, 2019. "The Best Day of the Week: New Technology Enhancing Quality of Life in a Care Home," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Wen-Huei Chou & Yi-Chun Li & Ya-Fang Chen & Mieko Ohsuga & Tsuyoshi Inoue, 2022. "Empirical Study of Virtual Reality to Promote Intergenerational Communication: Taiwan Traditional Glove Puppetry as Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Simplice A. Asongu & Nicholas M. Odhiambo & Mushfiqur Rahman, 2024. "Information Technology, Inequality, and Adult Literacy in Developing Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3927-3945, March.
    5. Vivian Welch & Elizabeth T. Ghogomu & Victoria I. Barbeau & Sierra Dowling & Rebecca Doyle & Ella Beveridge & Elisabeth Boulton & Payaam Desai & Jimmy Huang & Nour Elmestekawy & Tarannum Hussain & Arp, 2023. "Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    6. Nestor Asiamah & Sylvester Hatsu & Frank Frimpong Opuni & Faith Muhonja & Confidence Chinwe Opara & Sarra Sghaier & Emelia Danquah, 2024. "Internet self-efficacy moderates the association of information technology ability with successful ageing among older employees in three African samples," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Vicente, María Rosalía, 2022. "ICT for healthy and active aging: The elderly as first and last movers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3).
    8. Daniel R. Y. Gan & John R. Best, 2021. "Prior Social Contact and Mental Health Trajectories during COVID-19: Neighborhood Friendship Protects Vulnerable Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-9, September.
    9. Cristina G. Dumitrache & Laura Rubio & José Luis Cabezas Casado & Eulogio Cordón-Pozo, 2022. "Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey Instrument in a sample of Spanish older adults," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 143-154, March.
    10. He, Yuan & Li, Ke & Wang, Yipan, 2022. "Crossing the digital divide: The impact of the digital economy on elderly individuals’ consumption upgrade in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Klaus Ackermann & Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Russell Smyth, 2023. "Broadband Internet and Cognitive Functioning," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 99(327), pages 536-563, December.
    12. Yu, Dandan & Fiebig, Denzil G., 2020. "Internet use and cognition among middle-aged and older adults in China: A cross-lagged panel analysis," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    13. Kwarteng Michael Adu & Pilik Michal, 2016. "Exploring Consumers’ Propensity For Online Shopping In A Developing Country: A Demographic Perspective," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 4(1), pages 90-103, June.
    14. Sestino, Andrea & D'Angelo, Alfredo, 2024. "Elderly patients' reactions to gamification-based digital therapeutics (DTx): The relevance of socialization tendency seeking," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Carmen Llorente-Barroso & Olga Kolotouchkina & Luis Mañas-Viniegra, 2021. "The Enabling Role of ICT to Mitigate the Negative Effects of Emotional and Social Loneliness of the Elderly during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Le Yang & Dan Guo & Jiaming Zheng & Yuting Guo & Zeyuan Li, 2023. "Association between Social Participation and Remaining Teeth and Urban–Rural Difference among Older Adults in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10657-:d:465400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.