IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i24p10641-d465131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Socio-Economic Determinants of Horse Farms for Grassland Management, Vegetation Composition and Ecological Value

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Frauke Hüppe

    (Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Anja Schmitz

    (Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Bettina Tonn

    (Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
    Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Johannes Isselstein

    (Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
    Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

Socio-economic context is increasingly seen as a decisive factor for sustainable agricultural land use. The high prevalence of part-time farming and frequent lack of formal agricultural education within the equine sector are often seen as reasons why horse-grazed pastures do not fulfill their biodiversity potential. In spite of the substantial variability within horse farming, little is known about the relationship of socio-economic determinants with vegetation characteristics of horse-grazed grasslands. We surveyed 122 horse farms in Germany, classifying them into four socio-economic classes according to farm income type and farm managers’ agricultural education. We recorded farm structure parameters, grassland management practices and vegetation characteristics. Socio-economic class partly explained the great variability in farm structure that we observed. In contrast to our expectation, income type and agricultural education did not distinctly affect grassland management and were neither directly nor indirectly related to vegetation characteristics. Part-time farming and lack of agricultural education thus did not adversely affect the ecological value of horse-grazed grasslands. By contrast, both farm structure and paddock level management affected grassland vegetation and ecological value. Therefore, the socio-economic context of horse farms should be addressed in further research with strategies targeting the development of sustainable grassland management in horse keeping.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Frauke Hüppe & Anja Schmitz & Bettina Tonn & Johannes Isselstein, 2020. "The Role of Socio-Economic Determinants of Horse Farms for Grassland Management, Vegetation Composition and Ecological Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10641-:d:465131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agata Rzekęć & Celine Vial & Geneviève Bigot, 2020. "Green assets of equines in the european context of the ecological transition of agriculture," Post-Print hal-02437660, HAL.
    2. Markku Saastamoinen & Iryna Herzon & Susanna Särkijärvi & Catherine Schreurs & Marianna Myllymäki, 2017. "Horse Welfare and Natural Values on Semi-Natural and Extensive Pastures in Finland: Synergies and Trade-Offs," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Anja Schmitz & Johannes Isselstein, 2020. "Effect of Grazing System on Grassland Plant Species Richness and Vegetation Characteristics: Comparing Horse and Cattle Grazing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Bailey, A. & Williams, N. & Palmer, M. & Geering, R., 2000. "The farmer as service provider: the demand for agricultural commodities and equine services," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 191-204, December.
    5. Haberl, Helmut & Gaube, Veronika & Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo & Krauze, Kinga & Neuner, Angelika & Peterseil, Johannes & Plutzar, Christoph & Singh, Simron J. & Vadineanu, Angheluta, 2009. "Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1797-1812, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Wu & Wenjing Yu & Xiaobing Liu & Yali Wen, 2022. "Analysis of Influencing Factors and Income Effect of Heterogeneous Agricultural Households’ Forestland Transfer," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agata Rzekęć & Celine Vial & Geneviève Bigot, 2020. "Green assets of equines in the european context of the ecological transition of agriculture," Post-Print hal-02437660, HAL.
    2. Anja Schmitz & Johannes Isselstein, 2020. "Effect of Grazing System on Grassland Plant Species Richness and Vegetation Characteristics: Comparing Horse and Cattle Grazing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Miriam Baumgartner & Sandra Kuhnke & Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen & Michael H. Erhard & Margit H. Zeitler-Feicht, 2021. "Improving Horse Welfare and Environmental Sustainability in Horse Husbandry: Linkage between Turnout and Nitrogen Surplus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Hubeau, Marianne & Marchand, Fleur & Coteur, Ine & Mondelaers, Koen & Debruyne, Lies & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2017. "A new agri-food systems sustainability approach to identify shared transformation pathways towards sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 52-63.
    5. Smiljana Pivčević & Lidija Petrić & Ante Mandić, 2020. "Sustainability of Tourism Development in the Mediterranean—Interregional Similarities and Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Nina Eisenmenger & Stefan Giljum & Stephan Lutter & Alexandra Marques & Michaela C. Theurl & Henrique M. Pereira & Arnold Tukker, 2016. "Towards a Conceptual Framework for Social-Ecological Systems Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services with Resource Efficiency Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Sanz Sanz, Esther & Martinetti, Davide & Napoléone, Claude, 2018. "Operational modelling of peri-urban farmland for public action in Mediterranean context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 757-771.
    8. Xiaoyan Cao & Jizong Jiao & Xiuli Liu & Wanyang Zhu & Haoran Wang & Huiqing Hao & Jingtao Lu, 2022. "Establishment of an Ecological Security Pattern under Arid Conditions Based on Ecological Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of Arid Area in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Celine Vial & Géraldine Fleurance & Geneviève Bigot & Pascale Heydemann & Sylvine Pickel-Chevalier & Florence Clément & Marion Cressent & Carole Troy & Roger Palazon & Jean-Luc Cadoré, 2018. "Diversités des agricultures dans la (les) filière(s) équine(s)," Post-Print hal-01906537, HAL.
    10. Mayer, Andreas & Kaufmann, Lisa & Kalt, Gerald & Matej, Sarah & Theurl, Michaela C. & Morais, Tiago G. & Leip, Adrian & Erb, Karl-Heinz, 2021. "Applying the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production framework to map provisioning ecosystem services and their relation to ecosystem functioning across the European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Richard Orozco & María Rosa Mosquera-Losada & Javier Rodriguez & Muluken Elias Adamseged & Philipp Grundmann, 2021. "Supportive Business Environments to Develop Grass Bioeconomy in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Maccarrone, Vincenzo & Filiciotto, Francesco & Buffa, Gaspare & Mazzola, Salvatore & Buscaino, Giuseppa, 2014. "The ICZM Balanced Scorecard: A tool for putting integrated coastal zone management into action," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 321-334.
    13. Oana-Daniela LUPOAE & Riana Iren RADU, 2022. "Social Entrepreneurship in Equestrian Sector. A Literature Review," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 5-10.
    14. Maria L. Loureiro & Anne Moxnes Jervell, 2005. "Farmers' Participation Decisions regarding Agro-Tourism Activities in Norway," Tourism Economics, , vol. 11(3), pages 453-469, September.
    15. Lunnan, Anders & Nybakk, Erlend & Vennesland, Birger, 2006. "Entrepreneurial attitudes and probability for start-ups--an investigation of Norwegian non-industrial private forest owners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(7), pages 683-690, October.
    16. Haberl, Helmut & Kastner, Thomas & Schaffartzik, Anke & Ludwiczek, Nikolaus & Erb, Karl-Heinz, 2012. "Global effects of national biomass production and consumption: Austria's embodied HANPP related to agricultural biomass in the year 2000," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 66-73.
    17. Andra-Nicoleta Mecu & Florentina Chițu & Gheorghe Hurduzeu, 2021. "The Potential of Green Bond Markets as Drivers of Change," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 24(82), pages 67-79, December,.
    18. Sundblad, Eva-Lotta & Grimvall, Anders & Gipperth, Lena & Morf, Andrea, 2014. "Structuring social data for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Bernd Pölling, 2016. "Comparison of Farm Structures, Success Factors, Obstacles, Clients’ Expectations and Policy Wishes of Urban Farming’s Main Business Models in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Johansson, Dag & Andersson, Hans, 2004. "The Horse Sector: Does It Matter For Agriculture?," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19999, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:24:p:10641-:d:465131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.